Maybe do less harm with it. May less people actively dislike it then.

Oh fuck off with that. Y’all are promoting the technology with the promise of replacing human jobs. What did you think the response would be?

That is not to mention building it by literally stealing the wealth of human thought and then being surprised that we’re mad you want to sell it back to us with brand new monthly fees. Fuck off with all of that.

All AI models should be required to be open sourced to compensate humanity for this theft of our labor and ideas.

I would have a lot less negativity around AI if the mag 7 and all AI companies agreed to sign a contract to be nationalized once they have automated a significant amount of jobs, with their profits to be used for a national basic income. I would be much more positive in that case, Jensen. Give it some thought.

“Won’t somebody think of the CEOs?”

Just buy a 5090 bro. Maybe two. Look at this leather jacket.

Says the guy who runs a 4,9 trillion dollar company maily because of AI, what damage? WTF!

Jensen Huang? More like Jensen Slop.

This is toxic positivity…

No, Jensen, you got that backwards, GenAI itself is hurting society and has done a lot of damage, the active and well-deserved pushback against it ain’t hurting anyone.

Your grift is what’s killing the world, asshole.

Oh look, man coming from a fascist refuge of yore happens to be a fascist and a sociopath, what are the odds huh?!

Not enough negativity, we need

“hurting society” - burst that bubble and fuck all of your investments boy

relentless negativity around AI is hurting society and has “done a lot of damage”

… to our share holders.

And by “damage” we mean unrealized potential profits.

Man whose finances are reliant on scheme really wishes you’d all stop talking about downsides of scheme, more at 11