Hi everyone.

I’m new to these kinds of innovative platforms, and I’ve come across Mastodon and Bluesky in particular. I’ve realized that both use different but equally free and open-source protocols, so my question is: are there any substantial differences between the two social networks? Should I choose one over the other?

Thanks for your replies, and have a great day.

    • Señor Mono@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Bluesky is sort of federated while having a centralized content moderation. Saying it is federated is basically like saying a napkin can be used as trousers. It will cover some parts, but isn’t the real deal.

      The substantial difference is that mastodon is really federated, and decentralized, thereby moderated at different instances and levels (by server federation and defederation as well as local moderation). Also, really important, there is no algorithm feeding you content a platform owner considers worth emphasizing.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Fair point, but I do think this is a necessary consequence of Bluesky being private. The major differences between the two platforms stem from private vs. FOSS.

        • Señor Mono@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Both issues are tightly coupled. There is no business model/value in a truly federated platform that doesn’t rely on algorithms. Try to sell ads to your customers, they will always prefer other platforms with proper targeting.

          So why would a private company use a protocol and architecture, that cannot be monetized properly?

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            I agree, when I say it’s necessary I mean the fact that it’s private compels it to act that way. I’m pro-FOSS.

            • Señor Mono@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I’m also pro-FOSS and pro-don’t-your-dare-manipulating-my-social-media-for-commercial-or-political-reasons :-)

              Catchy, I know.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep this is the only difference. Bluesky is promoted by the business owners, so it will have more activity and probably more consistent development and support. At the same time, it is a business and enshittification axioms still apply.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I agree, but I can understand why BlueSky is doing better. A key component of the quality of the product is the number of users. I’m not active on either of them, but I do have a Mastodon account I barely use because it feels lonely.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Popularity at the cost of ads, algorithms, and corpo censorship isn’t something I am willing to trade. Though I don’t use Mastodon or Bluesky, I just use Lemmy.