• presoak@lazysoci.alOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    One is the product of firsthand observation and careful reasoning, the other is a story told by authority.

    Surely you appreciate the difference.

      • presoak@lazysoci.alOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        You argue like a medieval religious zealot. And that seems to be completely normal.

          • presoak@lazysoci.alOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            A medieval religious zealot’s style of argumentation is characterized by his appeal to dogma.

            • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              That’s a fun fact, I’ll have to remember that, but to be clear, I’m not saying nobody should question authority, by all means, question away, do some research, find out why the established truths are established truths.

              But, I don’t understand why we should give any respect to someone who wastes time unsuccessfully trying to deny reality.

              If someone went into space and sent back a photo of a flat earth, I might start asking questions myself, but so far, despite numerous attempts, there is absolutely no evidence of that, so I think anyone wasting their time on that endeavor is on the same level as someone trying to flap their arms until they fly away.