hot take?

Edit: got nothing against Ubuntu, it’s Linux after all and that’s what matters 🌻 Edit2: people took this very seriously for being a shower thought…

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Im of the opinion that the distro is far less important than the Desktop Environment. Ubuntu only really “feels like Ubuntu” because of GNOME.

      • folkrav@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Most of what differentiates a distro from another is one of:

        • package manager
        • default packages/configurations (including the desktop environment)
        • init system

        The rest well… it’s Linux.

      • cam_i_am@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Definitely, I don’t really like Ubuntu that much even though it’s my go-to. What I like is Xfce. Whether I get it via xubuntu or something else I don’t really care.

  • mako@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Jesus Christ this thread is full of people who don’t realize they’re the judging hipster in the post.

    Ubuntu isn’t the entry level distro that you move on from once you’ve gotten your feet wet, and your not very subtle pats on your own backs for using something different aren’t earned.

    Does it do everything the user needs from it? If so, don’t tell them that they need to “graduate” to a “better” flavor.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      For real I started on Ubuntu and nearly a decade later I still would be on Ubuntu if it wasn’t for their migration to snaps with the proprietary back end.

    • olutukko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      for real. my uncle has been programmer his whole life and he was always the most linux guy I’ve known. I have never seen him use any other os. and yet he uses ubuntu. his own words are thar he doesn’t care about all the bells and whistles that come trough distros like arch or gentoo. ubuntu works well enough for him and it’s what he is used to, so he uses that.

      using ubuntu defiently does not mean you’re a noob or non-techy linux user. personally I wouldn’t touch it again but the linux culture about arch being superior and others being for noobs is ridiculous

      • vanderbilt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        This 1000%. Since basically High School I’ve been on Ubuntu for the machines I need to work, because at the end of the day it usually does. Some of the people I meet see that I use a Chromebook with the containers enabled and have similar reactions. “How can you use that it’s not even real Linux?”, as if it isn’t literally a Linux kernel. The Steam Deck is popular because you don’t need to know Linux to use it, and Ubuntu is popular because you don’t need to know a lot of Linux to use it.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I ran Gentoo for about 3 years (and will likely return soon) and I reckon there are plenty of really advanced Ubuntu users who know more about how my system works than I do.

      Any mainstream general purpose distro can do mostly anything and can be used by power users. Some should ONLY be used by power users, but that doesn’t make them inherently better than a distro that both a newbie and a power user can understand and use.

      You know why I use Gentoo? Literally the bragging rights. I doubt I’m optimizing things THAT much with my fancy compiler flags.

      • olutukko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        this is so true. just because one can use more advanced systems doesn’t mean he’s smarter than all the more “basic” system users. especially in the linux world.

        all of the distros can pretty much do the same thing, some distros are just more focused on the ease of use.

    • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I still prefer nerdy hipster elitists gatekeepers from greedy corps after all is said and done. The first is unfortunate flaw of human character, the second is a calculated machine. If this is the price to pay then so be it. Individuality often isn’t as nice on the surface as the common but the common often has hidden sinister motives under the comfy, smoothened out rug of user friendliness.

      Lonely nerds don’t have PR and marketing teams but also won’t stab you in the back for profit. Sometimes they can be huge assholes though.

  • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The neck beards that judge someone’s distro choice without knowing their use cases don’t represent the Linux community. Just use the best tool for the job

      • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        To be fair, most tools are pretty bad at all other jobs besides the one it was made for. Same goes for an OS. If Ubuntu is made to off ramp people more comfortable with Windows, then that’s just a fine purpose for aln OS.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Only linux newbies and weirdos hate on Ubuntu. It’s a good all around operating system. Not the best choice and Canonical fails a lot but it’s still a net good.

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I have used Ubuntu for years. I’m not a noob by any means, and would consider myself more advanced than most users. I used to love tinkering, but once I had a set of scripts built that set everything up just the way I like it on a new install, the need to tinker faded.

    I have recently switched to Debian due to bloat and snaps, but I won’t ever judge an Ubuntu user.

  • dajoho@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Anyone using Ubuntu is one person less using windows. I call that a win. Everyone has to start somewhere!

  • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    My first Distro was OpenSuse. idk. even why anymore, but maybe already because of KDE. I just never got warm with Gnome and to me KDE feels easier to get a grasp off, when coming from windows.

  • Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Correct me if I’m wrong,
    but I have been disliking Ubuntu because they use:

    • Proprietary pieces in their code
    • Telemetry (spyware)
    • Snap packages by default
    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      And thats fine. You are entitled to your opinion, and your opinion is based on actual things.

      As long as you don’t denigrate and insult others for using it, or try to pretend you’re the superior linux hackerman for not using it, You’re all good.

  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    the problem with ubuntu is canonical, it’s a shame it’s got the reputation as “the third OS” when it’s basically the only distro that’s trying to replicate the walled gardens of microsoft and apple.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I wouldn’t describe Microsoft as a walled garden (and Canonical even less). But maybe that term comes with degrees, and different perspectives of what’s tolerable.

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Windows is less of a “walled garden”, and more like a shared garden where the other gardener is really inconsiderate and will mess up your part of the garden whenever it doesn’t align with their vision.