• yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why is Hollywood hell bent on not creating original IP ever again? It seems like every movie is either a sequel, a reboot, a reimagining, etc. Does anyone just sit down and say “Hey, let’s create a brand new story with new characters and new ideas!”

    Could it be that we are tired of seeing the same old stories with some “controversial” changes and then months of press complaining about people wanting to see or not wanting to see it?

    It couldn’t be my imagination that in the 90s there were way less sequels/reboots.

    • Aragaren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It isn’t yourimagination.

      What it really comes down to is risk. In the 90s, studios relied on the dvd release as a second boost to revenue so if a film didn’t do well in theaters it had a back up.

      With physical media all but gone the studios can only rely on theater revenue which has to be split with the theater itself.

      Because of this, execs are sticking with successful old faithfuls rather than risking money on unprodictable new IP.

    • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think a bunch of ip copyright will be public domain soon, so they are squeezing the last bit of money out. All the original artists are probably dead, so they don’t have to pay royalties. I dunno

      I read that’s why we have so many super hero movies. I’m guessing all this stuff got copyright protection in the fifties.