Why is it so hard?

  • null@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    if you use Bitcoin as a “store of value”, you’re indirectly supporting drug cartels

    🥱

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Oh max comment depth reached, but you’re still sore for some more public humiliation? Sure, buddy.

      You can’t address anything you’ve said in the thread. I love commenting, because I can talk about the argument I made and how everything I’ve said has been correct, while you’ve been fumbling about and now have to avoid literally everything you said because you made stupid mistakes that you’re ashamed to admit.

      You didn’t account for inflation, and just looked at the price of gold while arguing it’s value has gone through “exponential” growth? This is hilarious.

      You have delusions of not supporting drug cartels when you’re “holding bitcoin” (meaning you’ve probably invested in it after it became popular due to the drug business, but if you had won some from like a esports tournament before it was popular then you wouldnt be supporting drug cartels just by holding on to it, which is why words matter.)

      You’ve also avoided telling me what your native language is. Prolly because it prolly is English and you’re just ashamed to admit how stupid you have been. :D

      “exponential” indeed.

      But hey, I know your ego will force you to come here with some other emoji reply. I’ve seen it literally thousands of times. I’ll keep going as long as you want to. Becuase it’s not me you’re lying to. It’s yourself. You simply cant accept yourself, that you were wrong, you were stupid. It happens. It’s nothing to be ashamed of. You learned new things. Accept it an move on.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      “Holding” =/= investing

      Using =/= holding.

      I’ve asked a few times now, what’s your native language? Can’t be English, can it?

      “Exponential” has a meaning as well. Remember when you told me to check it, and I did, and then you still stomped your foot about how Bitcoin didn’t have exponential growth in value, or if it did, then gold did as well, then you proceeded to prove yourself wrong? Remember that?

      Well, that all happened after I linked you proof of how there’s trillions in value being used by the drug trade. This means that if you invest in that market, it’s value will grow, and the people who already have the largest market portion and are holding the most, experience the most profit. And those people, like I’ve proved a dozen times, are criminals.

      But you can’t address any of that.

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        if you use Bitcoin as a “store of value”, you’re indirectly supporting drug cartels

        🥱

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Oh wee got to the point where you’ve just completely shut down and are just having such a tantrum you won’t even inputting words, but have to spam smileys.

          Yawn”, like some kid told me earlier.

          “Holding” =/= investing

          Using =/= holding.

          I’ve asked a few times now, what’s your native language? Can’t be English, can it?

          “Exponential” has a meaning as well. Remember when you told me to check it, and I did, and then you still stomped your foot about how Bitcoin didn’t have exponential growth in value, or if it did, then gold did as well, then you proceeded to prove yourself wrong? Remember that?

          Well, that all happened after I linked you proof of how there’s trillions in value being used by the drug trade. This means that if you invest in that market, it’s value will grow, and the people who already have the largest market portion and are holding the most, experience the most profit. And those people, like I’ve proved a dozen times, are criminals.

          But you can’t address any of that. You can’t even say anything anymore.

          Just keep shaming yourself publicly, because you can’t stand behind your words, you fumble make embarrassing mistakes, prove yourself wrong with your own data. It’s ridiculous.

          Let’s see how you’re gonna continue this tantrum.

          • null@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone put so much effort into shadowboxing to defend such a boring take.

            🥱

            I’ll add it to the pile along with how I’m murdering Gazan babies and burning the planet.

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Like I’ve said all along, you know you’re wrong, and you’re just unable to admit it. I’ve seen this tantrum literally thousands of times online.

              What you should do is take the L and slink away, but you wont.

              You’ll keep replying out of some weird obsession, despite being very clearly wrong about a bunch of things, which I’m gonna list once more.

              I proved my claim that supporting Bitcoin indirectly supports drug cartels, (with data from Europol among other sources). You couldn’t accept it. You started having this tantrum, which I’ve been being entertained by for days.

              You said Bitcoin hasn’t had exponential growth, and then thought that gold did, and then linked data proving yourself wrong.

              How much more can you shame yourself man? Just take the L, bow and next time don’t talk about shit you don’t understand the basics of. :D

              • null@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                More shadowboxing backing up a boring take

                🥱

                Edit because max comment depth reached:

                because you’re still trying to “win” a debate

                Okay, the irony of this one actually made me snort audibly.

                your ego will force you to come here

                snort

                • Dasus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Exactly as I called it.

                  More pathetic avoidance, because you’re still trying to “win” a debate you yourself proved yourself wrong in.

                  It’s hilarious.

                  You need less physical gold today to buy a house than in 1901. Yet you cry “go look at the definition of the word ‘exponential’”. I genuinely can’t make up stuff this hilarious. And you keep giving me more.

                  So, I have proved and sourced my claim and all you can do is spam immature garbage. Does it make you feel like a winner? ;>