• isekaihero@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    That’s weasel speak. Hiding behind a user agreement is a pathetic excuse for bad behavior on the part of the developer. The developer decides what is in that agreement. It can be changed at any time, and 'but you agreed to this" is a poor excuse for laziness and disrespect for the community that supported them for so many years.

    Transitioning the game into an offline mode could be done with some development time spent on a final update. Take out the multiplayer stuff, let the game run offline, and put the game up for sale as an idler for like $5 or $10. It might not make much money but it lets players continue to play a game that they love. It shows that you as a developer care about your product and the customers who have supported you for so long.

    • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’s the point of agreements though. If you buy a game and don’t like the agreement you should be allowed to return it. If they change the agreement you should be allowed to return it. Agreements aren’t inherently a bad thing. There just hasn’t been enough backlash about bad agreements or the business models they create.

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Weasling out of things is what separates us from the animals… except the weasel of course.