• Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    From the article, it sounds more like they’re using shared databases and facial recognition more than smartphones or similar. So they’d presumably have the requisite devices at customs.

    • thejml@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      That doesn’t sound better. I get the shared databases, though it does introduce security issues. But the facial recognition that’s been proven flaked and flawed and based on biometric data that can be leaked and never changed… no thank you.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Agreed. And even if there are devices plugged in and always running and (miraculously) always functional, what do you do in a disaster situation where all infrastructure is knocked out? That is the exact time you’d want to make sure there are no impediments to foreign support being able to enter the country. But with nothing physical to fall back on for identification, what would you do?

        I’m all for digitizing currency and the like, I really never carry cash anymore. But ID documents are still crucial to have physical copies of, and the passport remains the only internationally recognized standard.

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      New film plot: the airport’s facial recognition system can’t tell the difference between the intended copilot and their identical twin, a terrorist. Question is, is it a comedy about bureaucracy or an edge-of-your-seat thriller?