As the title suggests, over the last couple of days there’s been an influx of doomer comments over the SKG petition. While it’s fine to disagree, I’m finding it suspicious that there weren’t comments like this posted a week or 2 ago

  • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It makes sense if you are completely consumer-brained and only see it as “companies will make less (live service) games if they are forced to support them/let them be community supported”

      • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        No, remember, it only makes sense if you are consumer-brained

        Less live service games = less consooming. Some people literally don’t care about things that are in their best interest, they will happily pay $120 for a game that has pay2win microtransactions and requires a monthly subscription and will also shutdown after 18 months, as long as there is a new one to buy after it.