• sepi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You have the systemd haters to thank for this one. They have wasted so much time talking shiz about a system they did not want to understand and downvoting folks posting about stuff they use. Next time you find something else useful in systemd and wonder “How come nobody told me?”, know that we tried and got drowned out by the cool kids.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I understand the concerns about blobbification of all these system into a technical monolith that you have to swallow whole or not at all, that you can’t really break down into it’s individual components. So if the thing you need isn’t in there, you have to chuck the entire systemd thing and switch back to SysV

      However, I quite like systemd so far… except for having dozens of processes, that’s not super chill to have so much stuff I don’t use running but OK, convenient.

      At least it’s not like Wayland, that we have been forced into while it was barely working, and still today it’s only kinda working with lot lot lots of non-working stuff and mega jank stuff while now X11 is rotting and dying. So we’re stuck with half-dead half-lobotomized graphics system… I hope they eventually get their shit together and I wish they would have made wayland working before killing X11.

  • paequ2@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Is systemctl suspend different than closing the lid or clicking “sleep” on your DE’s power menu?

    • basiclemmon98@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      No, it’s not different, I just use Arch and have no power menu anymore, nor did I usually close my laptop lid while I was still planning to use it. I usually just powered it down fully because it used to start very fast, but I think the laptop bios battery is dying or something, because it turns on much slower now than it did before. So finding the actual command that triggers the suspend state was so epic, because I can script and bind it now.

      • mina86@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I just use Arch

        You have only yourself to blame then. You’ve chosen a distribution which expects users to learn how the system works and it’s on you to figure out how to suspend the system.

        I think the laptop bios battery is dying

        This is unlikely. If the battery was dying, you’d be loosing BIOS/UEFI settings including time. Once the computer starts up, the battery is unused.

        • oeuf@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 hour ago

          “I take full responsibility for my Arch install” is one of my favourite lines from a linux youtuber.

        • basiclemmon98@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Yes, that’s why I chose the distro I chose, and why this was not a serious post were I was actually upset, I enjoy learning and reading, I just wanted to make a post about suspend bc it has made me happy. I am also aware the bios battery does nothing once it’s booted, once it’s booted the performance is the same as it has always been. So I assumed the cmos battery is dying, but not dead enough to lose settings yet.