So, I assume that if you put 100 people on a spaceship and sent them to wherever, they’d get very inbred in a few generations. How many people would you need for this to not happen, accounting for the fact that there will eventually be people who are infertile or die before having children?

  • Ziggurat@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    If you are strictly controlling genomes and breeding pairs, ignoring monogamy and social norms. You might be able to get away with 100

    In a Sci fi context where we have generation ships, I would add frozen sperm/eggs to the equation and even artificial womb. In like a 100kg package you can store a lot of genetic material. That’s pretty fucked up (and a nice writing prompt) but definitely doable.

    At this point the question is also cultural what is the minimum amount of person to keep a population able to maintain a large ship over centuries and produce enough food

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      i don’t think it’s that fucked up to have everyone with a womb be a surrogate mother, you’d just have to select people who are okay with it. There’s nothing wrong with being a surrogate, it’s basically just adoption except you get to give birth to the child.