You must log in or register to comment.
Before I even read the article, let me guess:
- it keeps Google under control of everything, giving it power to kick out competitors on a whim
- it claims it’s “to protect those disgusting pieces of shit called users from causing themselves harm”
- it claims Google did nothing wrong
Now, reading the article…
- “Google has denied any wrongdoing throughout the closely watched litigation.” - that’s #3 right off the bat
- “Under the new proposal, Google would allow users to more easily download and install third-party app stores that meet new security and safety standards.” - who decides those standards? If Google itself, that’s #1
- Sameer Samat, Google’s president of Android Ecosystem, said, opens new tab on Tuesday the proposed changes maintained user safety - #2.
*Yawn*
This might end up in front of a judge again.
Under the new proposal, Google would allow users to more easily download and install third-party app stores that meet new security and safety standards.
So it looks like the upcoming ID verification for devs will remain?



