• Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Before I even read the article, let me guess:

    1. it keeps Google under control of everything, giving it power to kick out competitors on a whim
    2. it claims it’s “to protect those disgusting pieces of shit called users from causing themselves harm”
    3. it claims Google did nothing wrong

    Now, reading the article…

    • “Google has denied any wrongdoing throughout the closely watched litigation.” - that’s #3 right off the bat
    • “Under the new proposal, Google would allow users to more easily download and install third-party app stores that meet new security and safety standards.” - who decides those standards? If Google itself, that’s #1
    • Sameer Samat, Google’s president of Android Ecosystem, said, opens new tab on Tuesday the proposed changes maintained user safety - #2.

    *Yawn*

  • LCP@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Under the new proposal, Google would allow users to more easily download and install third-party app stores that meet new security and safety standards.

    So it looks like the upcoming ID verification for devs will remain?