IMO:

1. Hostility against corporations, commercialisation, advertisement.
2. Decentralisation.
3. Simple standards even a codemonkey can implement, and even a layperson can use.

Easier said than done, I know.

CW: metalinguistic usage of slurs. Also, bear in mind I’m not black, I’m just some random nobody.

Unless you’re using a slur metalinguistically¹, or quoting someone who used it², you probably won’t be able to erase its negative associations; they’re there by default, you’d need to actively erase/contradict them.

And that’s not what you did. In fact, your comment only works because of that negative connotation; note how silly it would sound like, if you said instead something like “Granted. Your username is now /u/bananapotato”, or “/u/ninjapiratezombierobot”, or whatever.

It would be different, for example, if you were using the word ⟨nigger⟩³ as African-American Vernacular English speakers do; because then the meaning being conveyed is not “a black person, implied to be inferior to other people”; it’s more like “mate, bro, chap”, specially in a positive context.

Same deal with the words ⟨fag⟩ — I don’t think it should be treated as a slur if you’re clearly referring to a cigarette.

So. While I typically criticise Reddit moderation (from mods and admins) as insane, and coming from people and systems with the reading comprehension of a green potato, in this specific case, I think they acted correctly.

Just my two cents.

1. Language being used to talk about language; e.g. if I say “the word «orange» replaced «yellowred»”, I’m using the word “orange” metalinguistically.
2. Even then it gets tricky, as you need to ensure your quoting doesn’t endorse what the negative connotations in the quote.
3. This is an example of metalinguistic usage. I’m talking about the word.

Fedora is certainly fussy.

Mon français était bon… il y a 20? 15? ans. Aujourd’hui, me souviens pas merde.

Trying to use French to guess how to spell it and I end with “bourgoisie”. Because then PT/IT start interfering and the word has /g/ in both, not /dʒ/ or /ʒ/. At least they force me to remember the “r”, since I don’t use it in English (non-rhotic accent).

I still try to use it, but most of the time because I’m mind translating burguesia/borghesia into English. Then I see some red line below the word, and immediately regret it, as my French is simply too rusty to even remember how to pronounce it.

It depends on what you’re trying to achieve, really.

Self-expression? Yeah, it still works. It’s personal anyway.

You write actually good stuff? Yeah, it still works; LLM slop won’t replace you.

Junk? Nope. Even without LLMs the internet is already full of it.

Either you vomit the “it’s subjective” babble (“there is another way to tell the story”), or you make a hard epistemic claim (“ai was not invented, it arrived”). Doing both at the same time is a sign you’re eager to bullshit.

But even if we disregard the above, or the fact the title is blatantly false, the whole premise of the text boils down to “ackshyually” tier idiocy.

Comment exemplifying why I show such disdain towards the community of Hacker News:

I don’t understand projects like these because:
1. If you care this much about Microsoft forcing things on you, why not use another operating system?
2. If you care this much about security, why not use another operating system?

Cut off this feigned ignorance — if you want to promote alternatives, do it transparently, instead of passive-aggressively showing disdain towards a project trying to make the life of some users slightly less shitty. While carefully derailing the conversation from the topic to what you want to promote.

[Nota bene: I’m saying this as a Linux user. Like, I don’t oppose trying to encourage people to use Linux, I’m saying this is the wrong way to do it.]

It’s always like this in HN. Always. Feigning ignorance, sea lions, assumptions, false dichotomies, whataboutism… that place makes Greedy Pigboy look honest in comparison.

On-topic. Microsoft, I hope this bubble bursts really hard for you. With love, hugs, and crippled stonks. And when it reaches the point users are making tools to avoid the “features” you’ve been adding to your product, you know you fucked it up.

Prolly preaching to the choir, but…

Big tech does not have walled gardens. It has corrals, full of milk cows. If you’re in one of those corrals, big tech will milk you dry, and cull you once the risk associated with you outweighs the predicted benefit from keeping you.

As such, whenever possible/reasonable to do so:

• Avoid big tech companies. They will likely treat you like cattle. If you’re looking for options, open source is typically way better.
• If you can’t do the above, at least avoid the GAFAM (Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft). They will treat you like cattle, you can be certain of that.
• If you can’t avoid GAFAM, avoid at least their corrals. For example if you have lots of Apple junk, stop relying on further Apple hardware or software; Google is equally crap but at least in this situation it has less power over you, so it’s a less worse option. The opposite would apply if you have lots of Google crap.
• “teh cloud lol” is someone else’s computer dammit. Once they deny you access, it’s as good as gone. Under no moment or situation, rely solely on the cloud for keeping your files safe; keep a local copy. And if the file is so unimportant you’re OK losing it because “teh cloud” is denying you access, just delete it.

inb4 “but dat’s too hard lol lmao” — play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

That’s basically the premise of Shinju no Nectar.

This article is such a slop, that AI could write it.

“Wealth” is the result of the produce of land and labour*. As such, just like stocks going up doesn’t generate wealth on itself, stocks going down doesn’t destroy it either. As such, the crash won’t “destroy” wealth.

What is happening, however, is that the stocks those people bought will be worth as much as Monopoly money. Ultimately the wealth moved hands - from them to whoever issued the shares.

Why this matters: if the wealth was actually destroyed it wouldn’t make sense to look at who got it. If the wealth moved hands, it does. You can and should blame the ones who got it.

*and before someone starts whining “wah, you commies only see errything through Marx”: that’s Adam Smith dammit.

Ouch. That’s awful.

Pick the one you like the best, really.

Also note that, no matter which one you choose, the developers don’t matter that much. What matters is the admins, the people running your instance. Your PieFed account is in piefed.social where the dev (rimu) is the admin, he looks fairly chill.

Reminder the Nazi put “work sets you free” (Arbeit macht Frei) on the gates of multiple concentration camps. Don’t let capitalism treat you like a camp prisoner of Nazi Germany.

I’m fairly sure the reason the tech bros’ cheerleaders [flagged] this link was not the paywall, but because they find deeply offensive when people doubt their “vizhuns” about “eh eye”.

Anyway. I couldn’t find a non-paywalled version. Here’s how I think it’ll burst:

• Vulture capital (Vanguard Group, BlackRock, State Street, Fidelity, Geode, and others) get impatient because GAFAM (Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft) CEOs promised them mad profits, and they aren’t getting them.
• CEOs pressure their workers further to deliver it. Market team makes even more outrageous claims about how AI will even poop for you, product designers manage to put even more AI per squared kilobyte as before, etc.
• Popular attitude towards AI reaches a low. Not the low those CEOs want, “AI gonna replace our jobs!”, but more like “this shit is useless, and a waste of time and money”.
• The potential customers for AI — bosses who want to fire 9/10 of their employees and replace them with a bot — realise they’ll lose money if they do it. So they don’t buy AI.
• Vulture capital gets tired of waiting. They sell their GAFAM shares and buy shares for whatever - blue popcorn, labubu factories, potato trees. They also sell their Nvidia shares because they know the gold rush is over, so no reason to keep investing on the guy who sells shovels.
• Supply and demand. Stonks go down. The market enters in recession. GAFAM and Nvidia survive, but in dire straits; “Open”“A”“I” is absorbed by Microsoft; everyone else involved with AI goes bankrupt.
• A few years later, neural networks are mostly a subject of research. There are only a handful of vendors sticking to what LLMs are actually useful for, but they’ll market it as something else.

Still a better love story than Twilight.

I was going to write a huge wall of text, talking about the core of this article. But the article is so good and sensible I’d rather not discourage people from reading it.

Instead I’m going to comment on a few excerpts. Mostly sidelines.

and getting relentless bollocked by cryptocurrency cultists who at first insisted that I just didn’t understand crypto. And then, when I made it clear that I did understand crypto, insisted that I must be a paid shill.

*Sigh*. This is like a bloody bag of everything I fucking hate: assumption of ignorance, followed by assumption of the motivations. But then, those are crypto bros; rationality isn’t their forte.

Start with what a reverse centaur is. […] Obviously, it’s nice to be a centaur, and it’s horrible to be a reverse centaur.

Lemmy-friendly way:

• centaur = tech that empowers, elevates you
• reverse centaur = tech that disempowers, subjugates you

“There is no alternative” is a cheap rhetorical slight. It’s a demand dressed up as an observation. “There is no alternative” means “STOP TRYING TO THINK OF AN ALTERNATIVE.” Which, you know, fuck that.

That reminds me the speech acts of Austin. If anyone here wants to go through that rabbit hole I got a Wikipedia link for you, but to keep it short: Doctorow’s interpretation of the situation is spot on. Don’t be fooled by the hordes saying “I’m just chrying to inform you lol lmao” or similar crap, this shit is a demand to give up, dressed as an epistemic statement. Don’t give up dammit.

Start with monopolies: tech companies are gigantic and they don’t compete, they just take over whole sectors, either on their own or in cartels.

To further reinforce Doctorow’s point, check the “institutional shareholders” behind a few of those tech companies.

• Google/Alphabet: Vanguard Group, BlackRock, State Street, Fidelity, Geode Capital Management
• Apple: Vanguard Group, BlackRock, State Street, JPMorgan, Geode Capital Management, Fidelity (FMR)
• Facebook/Meta: Vanguard Group, BlackRock, Fidelity
• Amazon: Vanguard Group, BlackRock, State Street, Fidelity, Geode Capital Management
• Microsoft: Vanguard Group, BlackRock, State Street, Fidelity, Geode, JPMorgan
• nVidia: Vanguard Group, BlackRock, Fidelity

This is like South America between 1580 and 1640. Portugal kept violating Spain’s turf of the Treaty of Tordesillas, but no way Spain would declare war on Portugal — because their king was the same person; there was no violation, only the same guy deciding how to organise his belongings. The same applies to GAFAM+nVidia — they don’t compete; their common owners simply decide which company should get which part of their turf.

It goes deeper. Who owns those companies that own the big tech companies? Well… “BlackRock is publicly traded and primarily owned by institutional investors. Vanguard Group (8.87%) is its largest shareholder, followed by other institutions like BlackRock itself and State Street.”

So when Amazon bids against Target for a key acquisition, or a key hire, Amazon can bid with shares they make by typing zeroes into a spreadsheet, and Target can only bid with dollars they get from selling stuff to us, or taking out loans, which is why Amazon generally wins those bidding wars.

Next link, Wikipedia on Greshm’s Law: bad money drives out good money.

If shares from those companies can be further “minted” (issued) at will by the companies in question, they’re “bad money”: the face value (how much you pay for it) is still the same or increasing, but each new share has a lower inherent value (you go from buying 0.2% of the company to buy only 0.02%). In comparison, real money behaves here like the “good money”, since the company can’t fuck with its inherent and face values.

And, based on Greshm’s law, those companies are likely not using real money to trade with each other. They’re using shares. Couple that with the “GAFAM’s Iberian Union” I mentioned above, and this means that, once the bubble bursts for one, it’ll burst for all of them.

This will be way, way worse than the dotcom bubble.

I tried it some time ago, and I didn’t like it. Dictionary lookup, Wikipedia lookup, calendar, reading statistics, news downloader, it litters the directory of the file with a subdirectory for “metadata”… too kitchen-sinky.

And as usual, a completely different interface from everything else, that sticks out like a sore thumb, and looks more like something you’d use in a cell phone than in an actual computer. Even Qt plays nicer in GTK DEs and vice versa.

The best one I’ve found was the one Jako³13 recommended, Zathura. Not perfect, but good. But that’s only because Okular is rendering images really bad.

(I guess it’s time I stop being a lazy arse and make my own reader. With blackjack and hookers!)

I’m trying it now, based on your recommendation (thank you, by the way!). Had to grab a file from some PPA to enable EPUB support, but it worked. Just Mint things, I guess.

The lack of UI is a bit meh, but I’m okay with it: mouse and keyboard controls work really well. Way better than xreader’s. And unlike Okular, it isn’t ruining the pictures. I’m keeping it, at least until KDE fixes the Okular bug!

That brings me back to the topic. I’ve been using Linux for, like, 15 years? And in Linux nowadays there are lots of options, but they usually boil down to

1. I don’t need an interface.
2. Half-working, half-broken. Our alternative is also like this, but the working halves are different, so use both of us together.
3. I got a kitchen sink~ it plays Merry Christmas, once you send an e-mail through the pipe!

Then I look at my Android phone and it’s the same. And based on what people say about Windows and Mac, it’s the same too. Perhaps I’m being nostalgic, but shouldn’t we (people in general) be rethinking what we want from software?

For example, Calibre. I personally don’t want a library manager, but plenty people do so that’s fine. Which are the features that they expect, that actually improve their experience when reading books? Do they really benefit from plopping an AI system into that? Isn’t this a bit already too outside the scope of what a library manager is supposed to do?

You know, what I really, really want? A good EPUB/CBZ/PDF viewer. Simple, with scrolling mode that works seamlessly for all three filetypes (yes, including between EPUB chapters), and that doesn’t pretend to be some sort of library or bookmarks system or whatever. It should do that one thing — to show the contents of my ebook — and do it well.

The nearest of that I got was Okular. It would be amazing… if not by a certain little bug, that makes all EPUB/PDF pictures look like arse.

But no, we can’t have that in 2025. Instead we have a bloody book “manager” that was already bloated before the AI bubble, becoming even more bloated so you can ask it what to read next. *sigh*

This looks like a twist of what I call the “cat shit problem”:

A cat shitting on your front yard is bad. But an elephant doing it is even worse. Both are shit and you want neither; but elephant shit is a considerably worse problem.

However, every bloody single time this subject pops up, you’ll see two sets of muppets:

• “They’re both shit, so there’s no difference.”
• “Elephant shit is worse, so cat shit is not shit.”

So. The orange guy in your comic is in the first set.