justdaveisfine@piefed.social to Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoA cold take on balancingmedia.piefed.socialimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1115arrow-down15
arrow-up1110arrow-down1imageA cold take on balancingmedia.piefed.socialjustdaveisfine@piefed.social to Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareDreamButt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·2 months agoare these not the same just changing who’s good vs what?
minus-squarePeruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·2 months agoIn the first panel, each class is considered in its interactions with each other class. In the second, each class is strong against one, weak against one and their relationship with the others isn’t considered.
minus-squareDreamButt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI read it as the adjacent ones being neutral or a 50:50 odds. But it sounds like ur interpretation might be the intention
are these not the same just changing who’s good vs what?
In the first panel, each class is considered in its interactions with each other class. In the second, each class is strong against one, weak against one and their relationship with the others isn’t considered.
I read it as the adjacent ones being neutral or a 50:50 odds. But it sounds like ur interpretation might be the intention