no, it’s not. The content of that post is explaining why they criticize Democrats more than they criticize Republicans. it’s not saying “both sides bad”
Could you explain the context? I am clearly missing something, because most of what I see here reads like dems are the greater threat.
Here’s an example: “They are not equally bad, the side that poses as an ally and a protector of is the marginalized while actively causing them harm is by far worse.”
“Why do I criticize Democrats” “…because both parties are terrible in every way, but the dems are terrible in a bonus way too.” I don’t see how that first bit changes the meaning of the rest.
Do you consider the two parties to be equally bad, or do you consider one to be worse than the other?
That is literally the content of the original post that spawned this entire conversation.
no, it’s not. The content of that post is explaining why they criticize Democrats more than they criticize Republicans. it’s not saying “both sides bad”
“both sides bad”
this is literally ignoring all the context. please try to practice some intellectual honesty
Could you explain the context? I am clearly missing something, because most of what I see here reads like dems are the greater threat.
Here’s an example: “They are not equally bad, the side that poses as an ally and a protector of is the marginalized while actively causing them harm is by far worse.”
the first clause is the context: "Why do I criticize Democrats’
“Why do I criticize Democrats” “…because both parties are terrible in every way, but the dems are terrible in a bonus way too.” I don’t see how that first bit changes the meaning of the rest.
Do you consider the two parties to be equally bad, or do you consider one to be worse than the other?
this is the most intellectually dishonest reading you could possibly make. kindly, leave me alone