In August 2025, Google announced that starting next year, it will no longer be possible to develop apps for the Android platform without first registering centrally with Google. This registration will involve:

  • Paying a fee to Google

  • Agreeing to Google’s Terms and Conditions

  • Providing government identification

  • Uploading evidence of the developer’s private signing key

  • Listing all current and future application identifiers

  • The link is https://keepandroidopen.org/

    • Vik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Waydroid will likely be a big part of that in the near term, though I’d image its use will largely circumvent Google’s recent impositions anyway.

      I’m curious about how projects like calyx and graphene are affected by this, if at all.

    • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Somebody explain to me how this affects something like lineage OS? It’s based on aosp, it has nothing to do with Google.

      Then if you add something like microG on it, how is that impacted by this decision?

      I suppose they could detect and reject anything from microg. In which case, Google has just eliminated a customer base. Of course, we the enlightened who even care about security and privacy are few and far between and maybe they’ve made that calculation.

      Personally, I’m in a tough spot since I’ve been using Google Voice for literally a decade and a half.

      Now, I can use lineage OS for microG successfully with Google Voice. However if they decide to block that I will be left with basically two options. 1. Give in and just do whatever Google wants, or 2. ditch Google entirely and use lineage and only side loaded applications like those on F-Droid.

      However, I saw an announcement that this move by Google effectively kills F-Droid. If their change does end up killing AOSP, then it really isn’t open source and uncontrolled by Google, is it?

      • zmrl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Because if google kills side loading on all non custom os devices, that removes the incentive for open source developers to make software if there is no way to distribute it. So even custom OS’s will feel this unfortunately. We might still have viable options, but nothing like we see today.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      i want to keep android open in the meantime while we don’t have gnu/linux phones as a usable option.

    • pineapple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean surely, they have direct access to the AOSP code, I’m sure they can just remove the anti freedom parts.

        • pineapple@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          They literally have to by law, it’s GPL software that’s how the license works.

          • zeca@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            Arent they already sitting on the sources of Android 16 QPR1? Im not familiar with the legal implications of these licenses, but i wouldnt be surprised of they decided to fight in the courts to keep the android sources for themselves somehow.