Yes, the more specific you filter the community towards the niche culture, the higher the probability. But to get there you’d probably have to filter down to specific sub-communities in specific parts of specific towns. I feel it’s intellectually safe to call the rest a vast majority overall.
Despite the down votes, this is the real answer to your question. No the vast majority will not find it appealing. You would be highly selectively filtering your audience. The answer to why, is culture.
You got crushed by the hive mind, but this is the real answer
Prevents naked short fraud and manufacturing shares that they can locate at a later date.
Make sure to contact them again and rub it in their face
Maybe with a schema that allows a one time verify, and then churns your entry. If that verify occurs upon entry synchronously at the time you vote, if possible, that’d be no less safe than the paper ballot you feed into the machine.
No different than how it’s recorded today. We can improve from there but it’s not worse with the upside of a public ledger.
This is the exact use-case for a blockchain, a public immutable ledger where you can validate your vote, but nobody can tie it back to you.
That’s totally untrue. Skin will return to normal temperature from any momentary increase in seconds at most. The cooling effect does other things.
Except learning in this context is building a probability map reinforcing the exact text of the book. Given the right prompt, no new generative concepts come out, just the verbatim book text trained on.
So it depends on the model I suppose and if the model enforces generative answers and blocks verbatim recitation.
I see a 7/10 in there that seems the most honest.
There isn’t, because you cannot prove a Lemmy user’s gender to enforce this. You can only moderate the content.
How about blocking this nonsense on Xbox? Need a pi hole yes?
What he said was actually really funny if you’re literate.
Why no social connections? Best thing to do is to externally connect and have things outside the confines of your current unhappiness.
No way this is true. His wealth must be sheltered. People making far less doing far less can save far more by retirement.
This is the correct answer in any single chain deterministic universe… It always happened just like that.
Combine that with getting rid of celebrity actors, this would be great. Need fresh faces.
If it is, then it already is, so your experience wouldn’t change from how it already is, which you’ve already been through… So the concept that it’s worse (or any different) to go through again ends up being moot.