• Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    49 minutes ago

    All while the subprime delinquency rate is getting worse. Yes, AmeriKa, keep buying those gas guzzling fully loaded behemoths that you can barely afford to insure, fuel up and maintain. Don’t forget to apply for a 96 month car loan.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Oh please do the 50 year mortgage!

    Please! Oh pretty please!

    The 50 year mortgage is begging for some laughs.

  • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The thing that really frustrates me is that I can’t buy the car I want. I would like a successor to my Chevy Volt but it’s become very difficult to find a compact hybrid hatchback in the States. It’s basically Prius Prime or bust, and the Prius is not nearly as fun to drive as the Volt.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Yeah. I am getting an Integra.

      It’s the only decent hatchback that is sporty that’s left. And it’s not cheap either.

      The civic hybrid is really good, it just came out. Much better than the Prius. But there is very limited selection.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      regulation is why cars in the USA are so large. all the safety requirements pushed them larger and larger and heavier.

      also the chicken tax is why our trucks must be large.

      • taco_daemon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        not USanian but afaik cars got so big over there because trucks (being work vehicles) have less (environmental, safety, …) regulations than cars, that’s why SUVs got so popular, manufacturers pushed them onto public. as long as the base for the vehicle is that of a truck they are legally exempt from many limits.

        source: probably “Not Just Bikes” on y*utube idk

        EDIT: just read about the chicken tax, interesting…

        • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          cars are way bigger than they were 10-20 years ago. My 2017 civic is larger than my 1995 Camry, and not much smaller than my 1989 4Runner. Mostly because of safety features. My 1995 didn’t have massive crumple zones and 20 air bags. it had 1 airbag.

          • argarath@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Smaller modern cars still have the same safety features, marketing has found the best way to make consumers want new and more expensive cars through the idea of big car=safe, which only becomes true if the other car involved in a crash is also big, but just like the comic shows, it becomes an arms race where it only increases the danger, as a bigger car also has bigger inertia, so a crash at the same speed has drastic different energy transference.

            • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              people like bigger cars for many other reasons.

              they are more comfortable. they are safer, they fit more stuff. they have more features than smaller cars. they are often quieter.

              and if you have a family you need a larger vehicle to fit kids and pets.

      • Kevin@c.im
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        @TubularTittyFrog @Benchamoneh How do you explain the existence of the Honda Fit and Toyota Corolla on American roads (curb weights: 2,381lbs and 2800lbs)?

        We like big cars and we can not lie
        You other libertarians can’t deny
        That when a car pulls up with a itty-bitty MPG
        and a 4 ton weight in your face, we get sprung.

        • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          those cars are large compared to what japan/europe drives. and huge compared to a compact car from the 90s.

          The Honda fit hasn’t been sold for several years anyway. The fit was ended in 2020. A 2026 corolla is 3000lbs, and the same size as Camry was 10 years ago.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Will it? Modern small cars are huge compared to old small cars in Europe too. Because of crumple zones and safety equipment. You used to be able to get a VW Golf that was 3.7 meters long and weighed like 800 kilos. Same car now starts at nearly 4.3 meters and over 1.2 tons.

        • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          the cars they have in europe/asia are illegal here.

          hence why you can only import them when they are 20+ years old.

          You can’t sell/make Kei size vehicles here.

  • Mossheart@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    We’re in the “I need to make my headlights brighter than the sun phase”. It’s just before the spike club panel

  • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    This could be solved so many different ways.

    The most obvious is getting rid of the stupid CAFE regulations and Chicken tax that basically incentivise the fuck out of making these monstrosities.

    The others are less likely to be done in a country like the USA with its 2 party system where the options are conservatism and fascist conservatism.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Or just apply the CAFE standards to all vehicles equally, don’t create loopholes that enable this kind of shit.

    • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Im sick and tired of this bullshit claim that we can only choose beyween conservatism and fascism. This completely overlooks the Christian fascist theocratic option that is also available to those who really love “freedom”.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The number of massive trucks I see without a speck of dirt in the bed that are used mainly for commuting and groceries is pathetic.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      And with the short box option, so you can’t fit 4x8 sheets of stuff in there anyway. Better off with a minivan.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I think there have been occasions where I have passed a truck stopped at a red light on my bike, while carrying more groceries or other materials than they have in their entire backseat and bed.

    • IngeniousRocks (They/She) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      22 hours ago

      If I could have a Fully electric mid 90s chevy S10 style pickup with modern safety features and no surveillance I would be sooooo happy. But no, if I want a truck I can buy old as fuck or get a wanktank. Closest option to what I want in the US currently is a Ford Maverick (which is literally just a rebadged explorer sport trac for the modern age) but that would mean supporting Ford, and like, fuck Ford.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Same, I recently looked for vehicles and this was an option we desperately wanted. We have a great ev now that’s tiny and efficient, but a small truck would have been great

      • Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        21 hours ago

        What’s crazy (and sucks) is they DID have an EV S10 from the mid 90’s (hence why it sucks: it’s exactly what you want, but they killed it)

        Of course it doesn’t have the modern safety features, but I bet you could still find one if you’re determined enough! Although it’s possible you already knew this 😉

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_S-10_EV

          • Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Even crazier to think how far we could’ve been if they didn’t kill all of these projects as soon as they could!

          • Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Glad I could open your eyes! I have no idea how rare they are so it’s possible you’ll never see one (or you’ll have to build one yourself maybe?)

            I only heard about them a day or two before commenting because of the recent EV1 auction! Turns out Jared from The Questionable Garage (formerly Wrench Every Day) got one driving again, which he brought up in his video talking about the EV1 auction

      • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You’re basically asking for what slate promises to be.

        Also, you totally didn’t say it, but I feel like whining about it so: A lot of people think that the infotainment in cars could be stripped out to lower the price, but a big touch screen is actually very cheap and it might even be more expensive to have a bunch of bespoke buttons per model, so really, the idea of a gutted out vehicle wouldn’t save any money. The only actual money savers would be in areas like the suspension, build quality, engine size, that sort of thing.

        • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Perhaps, but having tactile options like buttons and dials is considerably safer as the ui can’t change and you can keep your eyes on the road

        • spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Correct me if I’m wrong, is Slate not Amazon backed? No judgement either way, I just know that rubs some lemmings the wrong way

          • Bgugi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            My understanding that the “Amazon backed” was a comparatively small portion of the funding, and largely to generate an air of legitimacy for the normies.

          • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Oh don’t worry, it isn’t! Its just backed by Jeff Bezos himself…

            Yeah…

            This world sucks, and sometimes you gotta make some shitty pragmatic choices. I would judge someone harshly for a Tesla but less so for Slate given that 1. Jeff isn’t so openly racist so much as being a greedy bastard of a human being, and 2. Slate is backed by him but not fully owned by him.

            • spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Ah the fun of the world we live in…

              Yeah 100%, I’m fully on board with your reasoning. I’m continuously arguing with myself over a Bronco or a Tacoma (only modern backcontry capable vehicles with manuals I’m aware of), so I do NOT have a moral high ground here haha

          • IngeniousRocks (They/She) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            While you do not need software devs for a button, once you have enough buttons doing enough things controlling them with a computer becomes much easier than controlling them using mechanical circuitry. This is the whole reason for SBCs like the Arduino, so people can make the transitionary step between “my project is simple enough to have physical logic built into it” and “my project is so complex it no longer makes sense for me to hand build the logic”

            If you haven’t messed with physical logic gates before, I recommend it! If you don’t have a physical workspace to do it in, Minecraft actually Makes a ‘great’ sandbox for playing with logic circuits. Superflat Creative worlds are the bomb for that.

            Start with a simple yes gate, then learn a not gate, then an And, then an Or, and build up from there!

            You’ll find very quickly that once you need persistence involved, projects with physical logic can scale massively with each additional bit of storage added. Doing something with that storage? Good luck! As a result, nowadays we pay someone for a tiny computer they already made, and program it to make our buttons do stuff, instead of just having the buttons do stuff directly.

            Edit: removed a word, analog does not mean mechanical, mea culpa.

          • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            You need someone to figure out how to get the car to interpret that button press. Whether it’s an electrical engineer or a dev doesn’t make too much difference to the argument.

            the software route actually makes a bit more sense at scale, as you can abstract all the same functions into the car’s computer regardless of what human interface device is activating that function.

      • spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I think Toyota just teased an EV Hilux

        Someone pointed out the shape is very Tacoma-esque, so maybe an EV Toyota quarter ton is on the way

    • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      So much this. I can somewhat forgive a stupid sized truck if it was used for work or some kind of off roading.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      It’s become a wealth/status symbol for people who don’t like the more traditional bougie shit. Lets them still delude themselves into thinking they’re salt of the earth types.

      I can afford for 2/3 of my vehicle to be functionally useless! Dohohohoho!

      • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        t’s become a wealth/status symbol for people who don’t like the more traditional bougie shit

        It’s because they are actual luxury vehicles. Get inside one of the new ones, and it’s basically what you would imagine a lexus or lincoln would be like. All the fanciness, all the nifty little features… Finding one that is actually made to ‘work’ is hard.

    • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      20 hours ago

      “Your honor, I got the M1 because it was safer than an F150 in my neighborhood with lots of small children.”

    • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’ve driven a Volvo L120H. It had. A pretty great visibility forward, better than my own car (Peugeot 108) lol. But that’s due to sitting so high up and only when I took the front loader off. Backwards it had a camera, which I was so jelly of when backing

      • whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I remember hearing years ago how the M1 Abrams was a battlefield domination machine that could only be killed by another M1. That was clearly propaganda. Those overweight, overpriced pieces of shit got lit the fuck up after being shipped to Ukraine.

        • general_kitten@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Russian invasion of ukraine has been the only war in quite a long time where a major power has been fighting against a major power. most other conflicts in many decades have been asymmetrical warfare/symmetrical warfare between outdated militaries. Ukraine has shown that drones are the new thing in warfare, they provide excellent intel, cheap short range pinpoint accurate light artillery. unmatched spotting for heavier artillery and with a bit more expense long range strategic strikes are also possible. With drone warfare MBTs seem to be mostly just the juiciest of targets.

          Where previously M1 could be resistant to most attacks, now with drone spotting a direct hit with guided shells can score a direct hit of 155mm shell on top armour of tanks.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Fucking with a coworker back in the day who drove a monster SUV with zero need. I don’t noramlly make judgement on that but I knew the family well. Her husband had a nice truck and their one kid was adult and moved out.

    “I drive it because it’s safer.”

    “So you’re happy to kill someone in a tiny car like mine, as long as you’re OK?”

    <stares motherfuckerly>

    “Aren’t you Christian? What do you figure Jesus would say about that?”

    “Get out of my office Shalafi.”

    🤷🏻

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m not even against large vehicles as there are legit use cases for them. I just think they should cost more, be taxed more, and be forbidden to park in certain areas.

    • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Should have to register them against a business or something that is licensed for truck use… Then let other people rent them.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I just think they should cost more, be taxed more, and be forbidden to park in certain areas.

      This won’t help with rich assholes who want to drive around an F-950 or whatever, but will make groceries more expensive.

      What really needs to happen is to mandate a special license to drive anything over like 2500 kg, and only be able to register it to a business with a valid use-case. To get a “small car” license (B-type), you have to pass an easy theory exam and drive around a tiny sedan around a city for 30 minutes (at least in europe). Trucks have different driving characteristics and are way more dangerous, so the driving tests should be way more difficult too.

      Also, maybe this?

      Oh, also, ban private cars in cities. Like, completely. Cars are so dangerous that their amount in populated areas needs to be kept to an absolute minimum.

    • YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      They already cost more and considering they have worse gas mileage, they paying more taxes on fuel as well.

      I agree with the parking though, back of the lot with ya.

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        in reality most (all?) states in the US don’t charge progressively more for vehicle registration based on weight, and even when they do, the thresholds are really high. So a F-150 weighing over 5000 lbs may pay the same as a Honda Civic weighing half of that.

              • frank@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Yeah, but I’m with the OP here. It should cost significantly more tax wise than it does to disincentivize it

              • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                and yet, people keep buying these things to buy groceries and drive on asphalt, so just fuel inefficiency is clearly not enough

                • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  the average carpayment is 750 new, 500 used. I bought a new car last year and my payment is $300. technically i could afford like a $1000 payment.

                  americans often pay like 30%+ of their income to cars. And yes, they actively choose to do this. Nobody is forcing them to buy a 60K F150 over a 30K sedan.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Texas used to, maybe still does. You made me try to look it up and couldn’t find a simple source. Plenty of states use MRSP or some measure of the vehicle’s value.

          Back in the day (Tulsa, OK) my friend had a 2-ton dump truck with antique tags (over 25-yo), paid $20. Meanwhile, someone buying a super-light Corvette was paying $650. (early 90s money)

          I say go on weight, maybe some factoring of value. Registration fees are paying for roads, if your monster vehicle is doing more damage, you pay more.

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The F350 is the smallest vehicle where they charge by weight. Unfortunately they don’t check for how much you use it, so for the 6 times a year I use mine I’m paying $.10/mile - while someone else who uses it for hauling as a job is paying $.01/mile.

          • shalafi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s your state. Just looked and registration fees and tags are all over the place.

            • bluGill@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              True, but as a general rule until you get to the F350 class or higher states don’t charge that extra tax.

        • AtariDump@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Except in NJ where you get raked over the coals for your yearly car tax… errr… “registration”.

          It’s the damnest thing; they seem to lose my vehicle registration every year but my marriage registration is good indefinitely.

          • __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The higher ev registration fee is to offset the fact that you pay no gas tax which is the main source of paying for roads.

  • salacious_coaster@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yep. And now we have little old ladies, who should’ve had their license yanked years ago, driving 4 ton trucks to get groceries.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      C’mon! I’m in the South and never saw some shit like that. Spent 6-months loading cars at Lowe’s, not one elderly person in a monster truck. Old dude’s like me stick to “normal” pickups like my 2004 F150.