I’m kinda surprised how willing this court is to burn its own credibility for small inconveniences to the Trump regime. I expected them to sell out the rule of law at some point, but I figured they’d do it for something big, with a maximum show of courtly gravitas. This is just clumsy and obvious.
Maybe the Amish were on to something.
sheepishly raises hand
I always read the article and this is no exception. Do you have anything to add to the conversation besides snarky assumptions?
I suppose when the author says AI they mean LLMs. The machine learning models that, say, interpret mammograms don’t have nearly the same issues, and I’d hate to see them all thrown on the pyre together.
I think it was satire
I keep trying to eat meat but it just won’t cooperate!
Yeah it’s not that districted voting requires FPTP, but I think the point was that it has an effect that’s similar.
Even if you had RCV in each district so that the elected candidate was generally more preferred by the people in that district, you could still end up with an aggregated outcome where no members from a given party win any districts, yet still had some small portion of voters in each district. In that way the unlucky party gets no representation despite having a non-zero voter base.
So while I wouldn’t use the phrase “inherently bad” to describe district elections, I think the arguments in favor of districtless, proportional voting are stronger.
This issue is actually pretty weird. Racial gerrymandering is a violation of the voting rights act, hence illegal. Partisan gerrymandering is completely legal.
In practice this seems to mean that it is harder to gerrymander in states where racial voting patterns align with party, e.g. whites vote Republican, blacks vote Democrat. In states where party lines do not predominantly fall on racial lines, you can hack up the districts to favor your party as much as you like.
Calling deleting metadata image processing is a bit of a stretch. And you can disingenuously clean images either client- or server-side, that’s true, but if we’re getting serious here about data privacy, one could independently validate, build, and sign an executable for users to run locally. I don’t know of any similar technique to guarantee what’s running server-side.
I’ve seen these topics about this is valid or that is valid, and I don’t think I quite get it. Like I can tell you if a JSON file is valid, but what would I even check to see if a person is valid? Do people go around calling each other invalid? Does anyone have an example of an invalid person? I’m missing something.
Personally surprised it was still up. I’m not sure I can think of a game that seemed so promising in the public beta, but then had so little at launch.
Exes? Okay.
Favorite car bangers? Right.
Fast food orders? Wut?
Making a new passkey when you switch services, is exactly like making a new password when you switch services.
Are you talking about Soviet elections?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_the_Soviet_Union?wprov=sfla1
Honestly what are you talking about?
Scam or not, the current market cap for crypto currencies is $US 2.67T https://coinmarketcap.com/
Eh. He’s a human being. I hadn’t heard about his fleet.
https://luxurylaunches.com/transport/gabe-newell-luxury-yachts.php
It seems nearly impossible for a person to be billionaire loaded and not make some irresponsible purchases. Is there anyone with that kind of money we should be highlighting as a role model instead?
I think there’s a place for both. So long as none of it becomes mandatory, and online communities can freely choose to offer anonymous or verified identities, it’s an idea worth trying.
Cyberchef does this and so so much more https://github.com/gchq/CyberChef