• 0 Posts
  • 146 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 18th, 2023

help-circle









  • I understand what you see wrong with my comment and hopefully can explain a bit better.

    Basically the entire article is based on anecdotal evidence. I found that the root of each of their arguments really fell into a couple different areas. One being a misunderstanding on the long term impacts of Covid, the second being that the author is a bit behind the times (cost/use of textbooks was an easy example as it has been a major critique in college for over a decade), and the last calling out that the “average” student he interacts with may be getting pulled down by higher enrollment numbers.

    For the most part my hope was to introduce some potential alternative interpretations to the things the author is seeing, that have some backing in statistics and research (although I know I did not provide them in my comment).




  • To me the authors critiques break down into three categories:

    • Impacts of Covid: in academia we are still very much seeing some impacts from covid. Students are behind in a lot of ways and that gap is never going to be made back up in a single class.
    • “Old man yelling at clouds”: he mentions his text books range from $40-100 for a class, but for all classes that can get up over $500. Additionally, many students know some books will be used once (I had classes that never used some of the “Required” texts.
    • College as a employment pipeline: given they’re Gen they are prime for the group of students where college was sold as a pipeline to good jobs. This has pumped up enrollment numbers (meaning it drags down the average). Lower-mid schools will be most impacted by lowering standards driven by increased demand.

    He’s not wrong that it feels like students are less engaged, but I’m not sure if not as convinced it is a shift in the populace as much as a shift in the average college student (both due to covid and increased enrollment).






  • Yeah, everyone giving it kudos doesn’t realize its actually even more restrictive than the previous setup.

    Before you could:

    • Have two consoles playing the same game (as long as both had wifi access).
    • Have two consoles share a library when not in physical proximity.
    • No time limit on sharing.

    Admittedly you could only share games one way with that, so it really only worked for two people. So families with more than two switched are about the only ones this would benefit (maybe a group of friends in close proximity).