• artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    51 minutes ago

    If it’s available in “nearly all” development then you can switch the tag to say “no AI” and then I can continue discovering and buying games that don’t have that BS.

    But we all know, as does Sweeney, that that’s a lie. And also that I wouldn’t shop for games on Epic Store anyway, for reasons just like this.

  • Durandal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 hours ago

    We’re seeing the rise of push back against AI gen stuff… https://www.theverge.com/entertainment/827650/indie-developers-gen-ai-nexon-arc-raiders

    Doubling down on the glazing of the ai bubble is pretty on brand for him. In before “tim sues steam for spurious claims against ai” or some other bullshit.

    Sidenote: IsThereAnyDeal.com has the steam ai declarations as part of the quick reference section on game pages now. https://mastodon.social/@isthereanydeal/115606686918493913

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Even if that did happen, it wouldn’t defeat the point of the disclosures at all. In fact, people will appreciate it all the more if a game is made without any AI involvement and it will become a selling point.

    • Carnelian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Plus, shouldn’t he want that information to be front and center anyway if he actually thinks it’s a good thing?

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        He, like the that Microsoft suit, has just enough awareness to realize how AI is being thought of by the general public, and knows it would affect his bottom line. Which is really all he cares about.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      At a very near point though, it’s likely going to be impossible to do it without AI involvement, or at the very least without proving you didn’t somehow.

      AI is being baked into almost every dev and art tool. They aren’t just talking about using ChatGPT, if your game uses a single texture or model that ever got touched by a machine learning algorithm, you’re using AI.

      • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        As long as AI doesn’t take away our hands, it’ll always be perfectly possible to draw our own art, compose our own music and write our own code. And especially in the open-source space, there’s plenty of creative software not jumping on the AI bandwagon.

  • who@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 hours ago

    PC gamers (sample size: at least 1) say they struggle to think of anything valuable that Tim Sweeney has ever said.

  • Nils@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Then some clueless person complains that Steam dominates the market. When Epic is constantly shooting their foot.

    People like to make informed decisions and those labels help. In proper countries even beer have content labels to say if there is rice or corn with the barley.

    • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 minutes ago

      One can be concerned by a monopoly even when there are no bad actors. Google used to be good before it was evil, and Gabe Newell will die eventually. Consolidation of market power (Audible for audiobooks, for instance, or Steam for video games) is not ideal. It is a shame Epic is such a piece of shit.

  • darkkite@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I think it should be more descriptive.

    using gpt as a stack overflow replacement should be fine or autocomplete for a simple for-loop

    using generative npcs, dialog, voice is another thing entirely

    • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      Plenty of folks add what ai was used for in the description of their game. Works well enough.

      Personally I just avoid the games outright if ai was used at all, but yeah

  • Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Tim Fashy again demonstrates why Steam is as successful as it is without a monopoly.

    Also, another reason to never, ever do anything to do with epic, proven by the Chief Enslavement Officer itself.

  • Sal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    No, it fucking won’t, Tim Sweeney. Go jump off the OG Fortnite BR map so I can default dance on you while you get sent back to the lobby.