• PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Even if that did happen, it wouldn’t defeat the point of the disclosures at all. In fact, people will appreciate it all the more if a game is made without any AI involvement and it will become a selling point.

    • Carnelian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Plus, shouldn’t he want that information to be front and center anyway if he actually thinks it’s a good thing?

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        He, like the that Microsoft suit, has just enough awareness to realize how AI is being thought of by the general public, and knows it would affect his bottom line. Which is really all he cares about.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      At a very near point though, it’s likely going to be impossible to do it without AI involvement, or at the very least without proving you didn’t somehow.

      AI is being baked into almost every dev and art tool. They aren’t just talking about using ChatGPT, if your game uses a single texture or model that ever got touched by a machine learning algorithm, you’re using AI.

      • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        As long as AI doesn’t take away our hands, it’ll always be perfectly possible to draw our own art, compose our own music and write our own code. And especially in the open-source space, there’s plenty of creative software not jumping on the AI bandwagon.