• LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 minutes ago

    Then put the disclaimer in all games? So what, not like they’re limited quantity

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 hour ago

    And CEOs will be the easiest position to replace with AI. Can’t wait for the share holders to figure that out.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    If it’s available in “nearly all” development then you can switch the tag to say “no AI” and then I can continue discovering and buying games that don’t have that BS.

    But we all know, as does Sweeney, that that’s a lie. And also that I wouldn’t shop for games on Epic Store anyway, for reasons just like this.

  • Durandal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 hours ago

    We’re seeing the rise of push back against AI gen stuff… https://www.theverge.com/entertainment/827650/indie-developers-gen-ai-nexon-arc-raiders

    Doubling down on the glazing of the ai bubble is pretty on brand for him. In before “tim sues steam for spurious claims against ai” or some other bullshit.

    Sidenote: IsThereAnyDeal.com has the steam ai declarations as part of the quick reference section on game pages now. https://mastodon.social/@isthereanydeal/115606686918493913

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Even if that did happen, it wouldn’t defeat the point of the disclosures at all. In fact, people will appreciate it all the more if a game is made without any AI involvement and it will become a selling point.

    • Carnelian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Plus, shouldn’t he want that information to be front and center anyway if he actually thinks it’s a good thing?

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 hours ago

        He, like the that Microsoft suit, has just enough awareness to realize how AI is being thought of by the general public, and knows it would affect his bottom line. Which is really all he cares about.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      At a very near point though, it’s likely going to be impossible to do it without AI involvement, or at the very least without proving you didn’t somehow.

      AI is being baked into almost every dev and art tool. They aren’t just talking about using ChatGPT, if your game uses a single texture or model that ever got touched by a machine learning algorithm, you’re using AI.

      • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 hours ago

        As long as AI doesn’t take away our hands, it’ll always be perfectly possible to draw our own art, compose our own music and write our own code. And especially in the open-source space, there’s plenty of creative software not jumping on the AI bandwagon.

  • Nils@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Then some clueless person complains that Steam dominates the market. When Epic is constantly shooting their foot.

    People like to make informed decisions and those labels help. In proper countries even beer have content labels to say if there is rice or corn with the barley.

    • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      One can be concerned by a monopoly even when there are no bad actors. Google used to be good before it was evil, and Gabe Newell will die eventually. Consolidation of market power (Audible for audiobooks, for instance, or Steam for video games) is not ideal. It is a shame Epic is such a piece of shit.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        Indeed, but shoving Steam under the bus, instead of critiquing their “rivals” for their lack of consumer-friendly alternatives, when for the most part they’re just doing their best seems counterintuitive.

  • who@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 hours ago

    PC gamers (sample size: at least 1) say they struggle to think of anything valuable that Tim Sweeney has ever said.