Proton is considering recycling old email addresses that still receive misdirected mail and appear in breach data, raising serious privacy concerns.

  • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I usually dont like to criticize art since there was real effort put by real people in it, but that doesnt apply to AI generated images

    This may be the most confusing, uninformative, boring image for an article i have ever seen

  • popcar2@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    What a stupid, nothingburger article.

    The company is considering releasing millions of old email addresses that were originally created by bots in its early years. These accounts were disabled almost immediately, but the addresses lived on. […] The problem is that many of these addresses are extremely common.

    So what? The author rambles about the horrors of getting emails from people who have accidentally written in a generic email handle. It’s not a huge deal. Tons of people using other email services like Outlook and Gmail also have generic usernames, it’s a user’s choice on whether to get one or not. These are old bot accounts that have been disabled for almost a decade, so it’s not like somebody would send emails assuming it was the old person using the handle.

    Proton says it wants community feedback, which is good, but the fact that it is even considering such a reckless idea makes me question the company’s judgment.

    “I’m mad that the company is surveying their community”, great argument.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I have never heard of an email provider that will hold your address for you forever, paid or free. This post makes no sense.

  • bitcrafter@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I am confused about how this differs significantly from someone mistyping their e-mail address so that they end up instead typing in someone else’s active e-mail address, because in both cases e-mails get sent to the wrong person.

    • MigratingApe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      One slip-up and the same will happen to your custom domain - someone will snatch it and get all your email addresses. This is what I am terrified about, sometimes life gets busy, you will miss the domain renewal and bye bye.

        • cRazi_man@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Or pay for very many years in one go and not have to worry about renewals. Just make sure you put it on your calendar to renew again in before 10years.

          • Ŝan@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Unless you buy a really expensive domain, þis is þe way. You often get discounts on multi-year registrations, and you pay, what? $200 for 10 years?

            • Quatlicopatlix@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Is there a reason you are using the þ character instead of th ? I always have to read your comments 2 times because i dont understand it at first. Was just wondering what the purpose is.

  • scholar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m sure proton would clear the inboxes before making the addresses available, so there’s no risk of seeing legitimate mail meant for someone else.

    In terms of misdirected mail there are two types:

    1. Mistyped email addresses
      where a user has made a typo when entering their email somewhere
    2. Randomly typed email addresses
      where a user entered a random email when signing up for a service they didn’t care about

    Both of these can affect any existing email address (so proton’s plans make no difference), and only type 1 could be a privacy risk.

    Email addresses aren’t secret, nor are they personally identifiable (unless they contain your name or are linked with other personal information) so I don’t see a problem here.

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wouldn’t the security risk be that if someone thinks the old user is still using that email address, or forgets, they may mistakenly send sensitive into to the person who now has the address…?

      Am I missing something?

      • scholar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The previous owners were bots and the accounts were deactivated by proton shortly after registry

      • popcar2@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Have you read the article? These are old bot accounts that have been disabled for almost a decade. It’s in the very first line.

        • Cris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Nope, I didn’t, thank you for correcting me :)

          I’m a lot better about reading the article than I used to be but sometimes I still don’t and just wanna chat about stuff with folks, and in this case that’s my bad

    • example@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’m sure proton would clear the inboxes before making the addresses available, so there’s no risk of seeing legitimate mail meant for someone else.

      this is just completely wrong. obviously Proton wouldn’t grant access to existing mails, but the new owner of the address will still receive new emails intended for the previous owner. this is where the main risk lies.

      there are most likely accounts with various services attached to these email addresses. you can discover some via data breaches, some via emails they send to you, and some you might discover via trial and error. it might even just be a service telling you that am account already exists when you try to sign up.

      combine that with most services allowing account recovery by just using email, even for the services without publicly leaked passwords, you will be able to easily recover access to the accounts and in many cases get access to sensitive information.

      • scholar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        The previous owners were bots and the accounts were deactivated shortly after registry

        • example@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          granted, that reduces the risk of real sensitive information being attached to linked accounts, but i’d still not be surprised if there are some accounts attached to them elsewhere if they didn’t get banned prior to receiving their first email.

          i gotta admit i didn’t read the source earlier though, and i agree with your points in general for bot accounts if they have been banned before being used.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    23 hours ago

    can’t believe a company run by andy yen, who is buddy buddy with the us government, would do something like this.