• ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    They could totally make money selling it at a loss. The reason so many people care is that there’s an opening in the console market for an affordable option

    • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      No, they couldn’t, have you read about the PS3? They were a lot cheaper than building a similar system so several companies bought thousands to build clusters, I personally worked at a relatively small university that had a cluster made of dozens of PS3s, since each Playstation costed Sony around $200 my university on its own costed thousands to Sony, and I imagine every other university and some private companies did the same.

        • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Only after they closed their system, which they did because they were losing money to every single enterprise in the world who wanted a cluster and PS3 were the cheapest option.

          • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The PS3 was using a rare CPU that you could only get from it or from some enterprise dealer at a much higher price. The Steam Machine is a standard x86 computer that can’t match the ubiquitous ThinkCentres in price/performance.

            • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              If it’s sold at a loss like a console it would beat the price/performance of any other x86 chip on the market, which is why they can’t sell it at a loss, ergo my point.

              • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Thry could absolutely do that. Valve makes a cut off every Steam game sold. If anything, it’d be MORE viable for them than any other console maker given the wider library

                • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  You’re completely missing the point. People can buy steam machines and use them as a PC without ever opening steam, or worse, use them as servers or parts of a cluster. If Steam Machines were sold at a loss they would , by definition, be cheaper than equivalent hardware, so companies would buy 10k of them to put into a warehouse to run stuff because it would be cheaper than buying the same thing from other places. This is what happened to the PS3, non-blocked systems can’t be sold at a loss because you can’t guarantee that whoever is buying it will use them for your intended purpose.

    • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      . The reason so many people care is that there’s an opening in the console market for an affordable option

      The consoles are the affordable option.

      I fully understand that it sucks that this is the reality, but sucking doesn’t make something less true.