We all migrate to smaller websites try not to post outside drawing attention just to hide from the “Ai” crawlers. The internet seems dead except for the few pockets we each know existed away from the clankers

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I have a testing website. I have never gave the address to absolutely anyone, ever. It’s not linked with anything. It’s just a silly html site living in a domain.

    It’s still being ping and probed to death by bad actors. No necessarily AI scrappers. But it’s dozens or hundreds of http petitions a day for random places all over the world.

    There’s no black forest. It’s all light up and under constant attack, every tree is already on fire.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I have a DDNS setup. Pretty random site name. Nonetheless, it’s been found and constantly probed. Lots of stuff from Russia, China, a few countries in Africa, and India. A smattering of others, but those are the constant IPs that are probing or attempting logins.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s because it’s numerically possible to sweep through the entire IPv4 address range fairly trivially, especially if you do it in parallel with some kind of botnet, proverbially jiggling the digital door handles of every server in the world to see if any of them happen to be unlocked.

      One wonders if switching to purely IPv6 will forestall this somewhat, as the number space is multiple orders of magnitude larger. That’s only security through obscurity, though, and it’s certain the bots will still find you eventually. Plus, if you have a doman name the attackers already know where you are — they can just look up your DNS record, which is what DNS records are for.

      • lauha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I love your “multiple orders of magnitude”. I don’t think you appreciate or realise how much larger ipv6 address space is :)

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          I wasn’t going to type that many commas for the sake of brevity, but it’s 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 possible addresses. I.e. 2128. So yes, I do.

          I consider 96 orders (in binary, anyway) as “multiple.” Wouldn’t you?

      • kazaika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Servers which are meant to be secure usually are configured to not react to pings and do not give out failure responses to unauthenticated requests. This should be viable for a authenticated only walled garden type website op is suggesting, no?

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 minutes ago

          There are several things you could do in that regard, I’m sure. Configure your services to listen only on weird ports, disable ICMP pings, jigger your scripts to return timeouts instead of error messages… Many of which might make your own life difficult, as well.

          All of these are also completely counterproductive if you want your hosted service, whatever it is, to be accessible to others. Or maybe not, if you don’t. The point is, the bots don’t have to find every single web service and site with 100% accuracy. The hackers only have to get lucky once and stumble their way into e.g. someone’s unsecured web host where they can push more malware, or a pile of files they can encrypt and demand a ransom, or personal information they can steal, or content they can scrape with their dumb AI, or whatever. But they can keep on trying until the sun burns out basically for free, and you have to stay lucky and under the radar forever.

          In my case just to name an example I kind of need my site to be accessible to the public at large if I want to, er, actually make any sales.

      • kossa@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        But an IP can have multiple websites and even not return anything on plain IP access. How do crawlers find out about domains and unlinked subdomains? Do they even?

          • taaz@biglemmowski.win
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            thinking about this, wouldn’t the best way to hide a modern websie be something along getting a wildcard domain cert (can be done with LE with DNS challenge), cnaming the wildcard to the root domain and then hosting the website on a random subdomain string ? am I missing something

            • confusedpuppy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I do something something like this using wildcard certs with Let’s Encrypt. Except I go one step further because my ISP blocks incoming data on common ports so I end up using an uncommon port as well.

              I’m not hosting anything important and I don’t need to always access to it, it’s mostly just for fun for myself.

              Accessing my site ends up looking like https://randomsubdomain.registered-domain-name.com:4444/

              My logs only ever show my own activity. I’m sure there are downsides to using uncommon ports but I mitigate that by adjusting my personal life to not caring about being connected to my stuff at all times.

              I get to have my little hobby in my own corner of the internet without the worry of bots or AI.

      • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If it’s https it’s discoverable by hostname.

        https://0xffsec.com/handbook/information-gathering/subdomain-enumeration/#certificate-transparency

        Certificate Transparency (CT) is an Internet security standard and open-source framework for monitoring and auditing digital certificates. It creates a system of public logs to record all certificates issued by publicly trusted CAs, allowing efficient identification of mistakenly or maliciously issued certificates.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Almost certainly. There are only 4,294,967,296 possible IPv4 addresses, i.e. 4.3ish billion, which sounds like a lot but in computer terms really isn’t. You can scan them in parallel, and if you’re an advanced script kiddie you could even exclude ranges that you know belong to unexciting organizations like Google and Microsoft, which are probably not worth spending your time messing with.

        If you had a botnet of 8,000 or so devices and employed a probably unrealistically generous timeout of 15 seconds, i.e. four attempts per minute per device, you could scan the entire IPv4 range in just a hair over 93 days and that’s before excluding any known pointless address blocks. If you only spent a second on each ping you could do it in about six days.

        For the sake of argument, cybercriminals are already operating botnets with upwards of 100,000 compromised machines doing their bidding. That bidding could well be (and probably is) probing random web servers for vulnerabilities. The largest confirmed botnet was the 911 S5 which contained about 19 million devices.

        • Melobol@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That’s amazing and scary at the same time. Thanks for putting it into perspective!

        • kossa@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          But there can be multiple websites behind one IP address?! They would not show when onhy accessing the IP. Tenhey would need to know about the domains somehow.

  • crandlecan@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Fabulous insight. I think that would make me very happy. Bring back the forests! Burn down the Nazi trees!

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Cyberpunk as a literary genre, and the Cyberpunk TTRPG in specific, are incredibly prophetic. In the Cyberpunk TTRPG (which predates the WWW), “the net” is eventually condemned (as in boarded up) because of AI and ia replaced by silo’d networks (think extended intranets).

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Back in the days of dial up and bbs this was a problem but you would still get robots trying to connect to modems by dialing every phone number possible.

    • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      War dialing! Those were the days. I lived in a city where war dialing was illegal, but that didn’t stop me… maybe that’s just an admission of stupidity though. Definitely had some cool stuff come from it though.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Disconnection is the only solution, walled gardens, paid or by invite, that prevent all the shit corporate America fills the commons with.