• jali67@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Used for background assets. It was promptly removed through a patch. It’s not as egregious as it sounds.

      • kazerniel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I still don’t like it. The models being built on non-consensually scraped artwork has been known from the very start. If they still thought these were ok to use, I don’t really want to get involved with their output…

        It’s the same as when any other company quickly replaces the genAI art when busted, “oops we didn’t mean to include it” - then maybe don’t use it in the first place?

          • trashcan@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            An equal amount that would have worked on it otherwise? Even so do you think that will continue to be true?

            • jali67@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 hours ago

              You’re quite literally speculating and probably have no tech background

        • fonix232@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Human workers did make those assets. Using AI. As placeholders.

          Maybe stop the rate hating for a moment to understand the situation before you comment absolute shite?