• Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Once again - Proton is legally obligated to comply with the laws of the country in which they are based. This isn’t specific to Proton, and they are not going behind your back to do this. In case it’s not clear, this data is directly from Proton.

    • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah, this is not really an own against Proton… There’s other actual issues with the services and leadership that are more serious

      • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The one comment by one person on the 5-person board who was supportive of one singular person that Trump had picked? That one?

        I’m not a fanboy here. I just hate misinformation.

        • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          And thanked Trump for their effort against BigTech.

          You hate misinformation but you sure know how to cherry pick.

          • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Who said anything about downplaying? This is how law works. If you are a company operating in any particular country, you have a legal obligation to follow the laws of said country. And if that means handing over data because you were subpoenaed? Tough titties, cough it up. Or get arrested for failing to comply. And this includes your own data if you choose to self-host your own email.

            Don’t mistake me understanding the law for agreeing with the law.

    • IceFoxX@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      It contradicts all of Proton’s advertising… They continue to convey a different impression; even though they provide such data, they still advertise with certainty, etc…

      Edit: I almost forgot… Back when this kind of thing was leaked (yes, leaked, not shared by them), I exchanged a few words with them (I am a customer, after all), and they denied everything and demanded proof… Nevertheless, I’m still with them because they’re still among the least bad.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        I just want a low cost VPN to get around in-state censorship and the occasional bit of piracy. I’m not running a Wikileaks fork or trying to do OpSec for The Revolution.

        If you’re spinning up your own version of Silk Road, maybe consider a home lab instead of relying on untrusted third parties.

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        No it doesn’t contradict their advertising. They’ve been completely open about this the entire time.

        And they’re not providing anything other than account details per the infographic. Account data remains encrypted

        It’s on you if you thought a business would break the law for you.

        • IceFoxX@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          No, they weren’t ALWAYS open about the issue (changed 2021). Aren’t they advertising themselves as safe? That contradicts it! The right advertising would have been to say it’s safe until the government comes… That would have been honest.

          I’ll go through my emails later and hope I didn’t delete them back then. But now I’m going to lie down for a bit.

          • village604@adultswim.fan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            It is safe; your data is still encrypted. They only provide account metadata.

            You’re confusing privacy with anonymity.

            Edit: and furthermore, Proton does have the ability for you to set up your account anonymously. You can use a burner recovery email and pay with Bitcoin.

            • IceFoxX@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              Funnily enough, the answer is no longer available. I wasn’t arguing against encryption. Rather, I was arguing against its occurrence. Although I don’t trust Proton 100% not to have a key.

              So, BTC is not anonymous, and buying it is linked to data. BTC is also nice in the blockchain. I always preferred Paysafe card, but you can’t get that anonymously anymore either.

              But now I’m particularly concerned that their response has disappeared.

              But it was sometime around June 21, 2019, when it came out (I think because a US citizen was arrested.) that they were working with states. To date, they have not published this themselves.

              Incidentally, I’m not saying that you shouldn’t use Proton. It’s still one of the best on the market, but you shouldn’t blindly trust them.

              At that time (begin of proton ), Switzerland was also still a haven for tax evaders, etc. Back then, they worked secretly with the government… There was no obligation yet.

              ProtonMail removed “we do not keep any IP logs” from its privacy policy 2021 (at this time cause a french activist) 😊

    • Mihies@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Imagine the Orange government demanding some delicate data for some political or pretty reason - should provider still comply? What if Chinese government does the same? Also I might be mistaken, but doesn’t US force providers not to disclose the request to affected party, at least they can?

      • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Imagine the Orange government demanding some delicate data for some political or pretty reason - should provider still comply?

        Believe it or not - when legally obligated, even providers like Google and Apple can and do comply.

        What if Chinese government does the same?

        See above. If a company is operating in China, that company (or branch) has to comply with the local laws. There are no ifs, ands, or buts about it.

        Also I might be mistaken, but doesn’t US force providers not to disclose the request to affected party, at least they can?

        I wouldn’t be surprised in the slightest if that was the case.