Edit: It works! Not beautiful and shows a concerning amount of “Error” lines on startup but it will do. I got VSCodium and ESP-IDF running, at least – and CMake isn’t awfully slow despite it being a crappy 4GB RAM machine (not easily upgradeable). The first boot took a while and I haven’t rebooted since, I guess it will be below 30 seconds next time (Mint on same machine but HDD was about 1 minute).

Edit: I hope I chose the right kernel here, surprisingly not much info online on this! Also, I picked “targeted” because the 10-year-old system does not use any cutting-edge hardware and all drivers should be auto-detected, I think.

After some experience with Linux Mint, I gathered the courage to try another distro. I’d like to turn an old laptop into an IPTV receiver plus FTP/OpenVPN/HomeAssistant server with occasional desktop use. I first installed Windows 11 just in case my family needs to use it (it fucking sucks, the built-in PS/2 keyboard doesn’t work half the time but that’s an issue for later) but now I’ll be turning it into a dual-boot setup with Debian as the primary option. Please give me some encouragement, I’m really afraid of new things.

Old pic: https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/d4bf0222-4fc1-42ab-a3e9-464087dec3af.png

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 seconds ago

      See my newest comment with the monospaced text.

      But yeah, not a real issue, I fixed it in 15 minutes. Apparently it was foolish of me to want Num Lock on the lock screen (Czech keyboard layout uses the number row for diacritics).

      Edit: Now I fixed that too. I can easily use numbers in my password now!

  • Decker108@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I just made the switch from Win 10 to Bazzite Linux some two weeks ago. It worked so great that I should have done it a long time ago.

  • AldinTheMage@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I love Debian. Been using it on my laptop for over a year. Some specific drivers are a little fiddly if you have nvidia graphics but it’s not too bad, lots of good info on the debian wiki.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      same here even though i don’t use it much anymore.

      for me, it was both the distro that i had used the longest at home due to rock solid stability and it’s become a signal to me that the shop i’m considering working in has rock solid people working on it.

      i’m going to miss working on debian in a professional capacity and watching it due it’s thing in real world production capacities for millions of people at a time.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        You’ve used Debian for a while? Well, you might know something about one of the problems that were a factor in my hop from Mint: I installed a stable release in 2020 and used the computer as a MMPC every so often, but then I set up a DVI cable to the family Windows PC so the MMPC became redundant, and will be until we switch from satellite to IPTV next year. The computer lay mostly unused for 2 years and then it turned out that it wouldn’t update to a newer, supported release. I gave up troubleshooting that. What kind of distros are most prone to this?

  • jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If it’s 10 year old hardware, you should be fine.

    I’ve only had problems in Debian with brand new hardware where I have to use the backport branch to get drivers (like for wifi.)

    Though mainly I use Ubuntu, where I would not have that problem. Not sure why you switched from mint.

    • flameleaf@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Weirdly, Debian currently has a newer version of Xfce than Linux Mint. Not everything on there is out of date.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        22 minutes ago

        Guess what, you’re right! Technically, it does boot but

        Debian GNU/Linux 13 mmpc tty1
        
        mmpc login: _
        

        does not bring joy.

        Also, why is the fan spinning? I’ve been on this screen for minutes while looking up lightdm troubleeshooting on my phone. Blinking the cursor and Linux backend stuff can’t be too CPU-intensive, right?

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        59 minutes ago

        I haven’t restarted it since but it has brought joy. It’s not pretty but way less setup hassle than Windows if you want it at least somewhat privacy-respecting. And even default XFCE beats Windows 11 on looks and practicality.

  • notagoblin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Mint is solid, if you use it and it works for you why change? Do you need to bother with windows? What do you use that can’t be done on Linux I wonder? Perhaps work out how to set a VM and try out Debian and even windows in a test sandbox so you’re comfortable with the processes before taking the plunge. Check out KVM, QEMU, and Virt-Manager.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I have worked with VMs before and still use an XP one sometimes. But modern Windows in a VM on an old laptop with 4 GB of RAM? I’ll pass…

  • Onsotumenh@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Just a little warning if you boot both OS from the same drive. Windows update can and will break your bootloader at one point (if not worse, tho that’s rare). Keep a Linux live or rescue stick around in case something breaks.

  • banazir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    13 hours ago

    No luck needed, it’ll go fine. You pretty obviously have all the experience you need.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Experience? Yes, but I’m also really clumsy and impatient. Lots of things, hardware and software, broke in my hands because I wasn’t careful enough. At least there is no personal data on the system right now that I could erase.

      • dentacle@bookwyr.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Lots of things, hardware and software, broke in my hands

        Some of us call it a talent and made a career out of it…

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      No, I’m absolutely not. What desktop environment should I choose? KDE Plasma is tempting - it would be nice to use it before I install it with Arch on my main system - but I don’t need the cutting edge or much personalization. I know XFCE best but GNOME is default… GNOME’s big launcher looks great for the TV but it’s also more resource-hungry and less customizable…

      I guess I’ll go with the familiar Windows-style XFCE and maybe add big remote-friendly icons later when I configure an IR receiver.

      • redlemace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        What desktop environment should I choose

        That’s the beauty … You can change any time you want (sudo tasksel) withjout losing your data. or install all of them and choose one each time you login

      • Brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’ve been using Debian with the default GNOME on an old laptop and main desktop and have been very happy with it. Coming from Windows I love that it’s way simpler and I don’t need to set a million options.

        But remember the thing with Linux is you’re not locked into anything - So try GNOME or XFCE for a few weeks, then if you still want something else install and switch over to another desktop environment. You could even install all these desktop environments during the Debian install itself and just keep switching every time you log in.

      • AldinTheMage@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I have used gnome, plasma, and xfce and they are all fine. I prefer KDE personally but they’re all going to do what you need to do. It’s all down to personal aesthetic preference, and picking one won’t hinder you in any real way. KDE to me just looks super nice out of the box for my taste, and I like the customization.

      • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        I have been using Gnome for a few weeks (because I have an issue with my tablet and Plasma works badly with it), and it’s shit. Very locked in, strange choices regarding how information is presented, waste of screen estate (topbar that sits completely unused)… Plasma was a million times better. If I didn’t have this tablet problem… anyway that’s my advice. Have fun. Debian is stable, you should be good

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I love this, because I feel the complete opposite in some regards. I love the simplicity of GNOME. There are some weird UI decisions; I much prefer to have the dock available on the desktop than to use the application switcher every time, but that’s about it. GNOME is very thematically consistent, it’s simple, and it works smoothly. It has enough customisation where the sensible defaults fall short, at least for me, but theme-wise I really like Adwaita the way it is.

          I use KDE on my laptop though, and I enjoy the tinkering with it. Feel like it’s fairly unstable though, Plasma just crashes at times when you tinker with it (though so far it’s never happened in normal usage). Design-wise it feels much too cluttered, but there’s a lot of options to play with to make things at least almost the way I’d like it.

          We’re spoiled for choice, and that’s awesome. There’s something for everyone.

          • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            55 minutes ago

            Yea to be frank I also love the simplicity of Gnome. I do apreciate its qualities. It’s consistent, I get that it tries to offer a streamlined experience. I find it sacrifices a lot to get there though. The lack of flexibilty (by default without extensions) wrt window/workspace management feels a bit crippling. I do appreciate the consistency. But that’s not enough for me to make up for other aspects. And for the overhanging feeling that it’s so strongly opinionated, it might just diverge from your sensibilities at some point, without warning.

            Yea, the single fact that we’re able to talk about this is a testament to the choice… 👌🏼 Pretty cool. All in all I may like Plasma better, there are true dealbreakers that make its usage impossible for me (tbc). Anyway. For now I work under Windows11. Whatever works

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I tried KDE plasma and I was blown away by how bad the UI design is. I struggled for like an hour trying to customize my desktop and it crashed a few times and even when it wasn’t crashing I was flummoxed by how unintuitive the customization UI is. I couldn’t get anything the way I wanted it and yes I agree: incredibly visually busy. I wanted to have a gnome alternative but it felt like beta software to me, and badly designed on top of it. Hard pass!

            • njordomir@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              41 minutes ago

              For me, I was a long term gnome 2 user and have used gnome 3 and various derivatives. Gnome 2 was still very customizable, but Gnome 3 was very prescriptivist. I feel like KDE gives me the ability to dial in my desktop quite a bit more and I really like dolphin and the KDE apps. With that said, I don’t hate Gnome. I’m glad it exists if only to encourage other DEs to keep getting better. I don’t see myself daily driving it, but I would gladly recommend it to a Linux beginner.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              It seems like the answer might be something like “it’s too different from windows! 😡😡😡”

              • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                44 minutes ago

                Yea sure 😁 think before you prejudice !

                FYI, I’m not hating. Criticism should be a fine thing to do, enjoyed by all parties, respectful and all. See my other replies for my opinion. I swear it’s not terrible, and you’re free to discuss it.

      • FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        KDE Plasma is very nice if you come from Windows and don’t mind an environment that’s somewhat heavy on performance - personally, I think it’s the closest, modern Windows-like experience. XFCE is very lightweight, but not very modern, as far as I remember.

        Don’t forget, you can also install multiple environments and then pick one from your login screen; that way you can try them all and see what fits best

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Well, you can try a Live CD for first contact. Or even a virtual machine, with a complete install of the operating system and desktop environment, without touching your actual system.

  • wildflower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I recently helped a friend install Debian via sms, it was surprisingly easy, and she had never tried installing Linux before. When installing on a laptop I’d recommend using cable instead of wifi, and then setup wifi when the system is up and running.

    Best of luck

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Good luck! And don’t forget to add the non-free-firmware repo and maybe the other additional ones if you need them. A standard Debian comes without. And if you’re following an old tutorial, that might not cover the split between non-free and non-free-firmware which happened somewhat recently in Debian terms. Their own documentation is good and up to date, though.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Good question. maybe I was wrong, I’ve used Debian for so long, I’ll either just update it or use the advanced installer… It’s certainly on the installation media now. Not sure if it copies it over to the system. Would make sense, though if it did…

        • vandsjov@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Good question. maybe I was wrong

          Yes, from Debian 12, non-free-firmware is default. Makes it even easier to install.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I’ll be installing Arch on my main laptop when I make the disk space and get the motivation (my mental state is almost as messy as the drive). I’ll also take the opportunity to reinstall Windows because it’s an old copy where I chose my real name as the user directory name (I didn’t know better back then), with a space and diacritics, which broke lots of things. But this is a server and I preferred Mint to Manjaro so Debian it is.

      • rozodru@pie.andmc.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I would suggest when you decide to give Arch a go for the first time to start out with something like CachyOS to get your legs under you so you can easily understand it. That being said Arch is painfully easy to install now thanks to Archinstall but going the CachyOS route it’ll install the packages you need and then you can understand what you do and don’t need when it comes time to install regular Arch. Otherwise you might just install Arch and then wonder why some stuff doesn’t work because you didn’t install certain packages.

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          55 minutes ago

          Why is archinstall “painfully” easy? Do you think its users will do badly at troubleshooting because they didn’t go through a setup process that teaches more about the system?

        • djdarren@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I spent several hours trying to figure out how to install Arch manually, before discovering Archinstall.

          I now have it running on two old laptops.

          My main PCs are running Kubuntu though.