• Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Here’s how it’s gonna go:

    Government of california: “delete this”

    Company: no

    Gov: okay well here’s a fine for $200 million, don’t do it again

    Company: that’s fine, we made $1.8 billion with the data, this is just the cost of doing business

    repeats next year but with a sternly worded letter

    Prove me wrong, California. Break companies out of existence when they break the law. Don’t just slap them on the wrist with a fine.

    • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Fine them $1 million per day per person who still has data on their site if they submitted the form.

      Really, these types of services need to be opt-in instead of opt-out.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I appreciate your cynicism, but I’m not personally inclined towards it. I think what it will ultimately boil down to, which you alluded to, is how the law is enforced. If they get fined as a first measure but then get taken to court for a second failure by California’s attorney general and get subsequently bankrupted, it might stand as an example to others.

      Or maybe they’ll still say the potential risk is still worth it. I dunno. We’ll just have to see how this goes, but it’s still better than the current options, which are:

      • Trying to navigate deleting your own data, staying on top of it, and hoping they’re actually deleting things.
      • Paying a private company to do it and hope they’re not just pocketing your money.
      • Doing nothing and getting butt-fucked by surveillance capitalism.

      None of those are great, so I’m hopeful this is the start of something better.

      • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Earlier in the year I read an article claiming that something like 40% of the data brokers doing business here (ie collecting data on California citizens) don’t comply with elements of existing law, such as registering with the CA secretary of state. So the author wasn’t bullish on the idea that they’d suddenly start just because there’s a new law. They are sayign the AG will aggressively pursue violators, but we’ll see.

        If nothing else, we’ll have one more data store to get hacked.

  • errer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    FYI the terms say brokers don’t have to comply until August 2026, so it may take a while to see a difference

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Most of the “500+” will simply ignore their legal requirements and eat the fine.

      But some won’t.

      So it’s better than continuing to do nothing, it’s at least vocally (legally) saying they aren’t cool with it.