• Auth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I do not get why people on distros like Endevour or Cachy say that they use arch. It makes me cringe everytime. Be proud of your distro, they are all good.

    • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Endeavour is Arch. It uses the Arch repos.

      If it isn’t Arch, then those automated Windows 11 installers with pre-configurations used by enterprises aren’t Windows. Of course they are.

      • Auth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Linux isnt windows so I reject that comparison. But by your logic anything running nix is nixOS or anything using debian is debian. Plenty of distros share repos, kernels, software but they are still independent distros.

    • El care ñá@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yeah, I use Endeavour and I would never say I use Arch. I’ve never installed Arch. That’s like the whole thing about it.

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I confess I have sometimes said I used Gentoo since 2007, when really, that was Sabayon, and not Gentoo until 2010.

        This was indeed technically wrong, or at the very least, misleading. Merely a choice of expedient shorthand, to avoid my usual verbose precision.

        Does anyone really care though?

        It does get me wondering how many “I use arch btw” are not really, and boasting a nothing burger from even less. XD

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Yup

          archinstall is damn near perfect for everything except corner cases as far as most end users are concerned. Installing Arch manually is just wasting your time these days.

          • silasmariner@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Oh, I installed Arch manually the other day and rather enjoyed the process :'( felt good to be reminded of all the bits and bobs.

            TBF I have been accused of being a time-waster on occasion

    • Marn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I’ve done full manual installs and archinstall installs of mainline arch and I would argue endevouros is arch. It’s more than just “arch based” it’s literally a basic arch install with calamaris. It updates from official arch repos and arch kernal ect.

      While I only tell people I use endevouros I do not understand why anyone cares if an endevouros user says they use arch lol. What is the difference between that and something like archinstall besides slightly easier btrfs configs?

      I’d consider CatchyOS to be in the arch based category but not EndevourOS

      • Auth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’ve done full manual installs and archinstall installs of mainline arch and I would argue endevouros is arch

        If I said I had just installed Arch and someone found out that i had installed EndevourOS I would consider that lying. To me Endevour has a completely different philosophy and culture than Arch. Its preconfigured to someone elses liking which is basically the complete opposite of Arch. They’re different in every way except sharing the same packages which a ton of distros do. If EndevourOS isnt its own distro then a ton of distros get erased and linux becomes instantly less diverse.

        I do not understand why anyone cares if an endevouros user says they use arch lol

        Well I agree it would be weird for someone to get upset over it I think having a baseline care for people to be truthful and accurate is perfectly understandable. Lying to me means there is something wrong like a person is trying to cover for something. I dont want people to think they should be embarrassed for saying they use endevour and feel pressured to say they use arch instead. Plus I would say arch being arch is an iconic part of linux culture and ought to be preserved.

        • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I think you just need to stop being elitist about it.

          Who cares? Honestly - who cares how someone installed their OS? We should be doing everything to get people to switch to Linux (of any flavour), but instead dudes like you go “oh, you have XYZ OS? Well, that’s not really Arch, is it?” What even is the point?

        • Marn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          That’s a good point, and I’d have to partly agree with it being lying. But only if I’m talking to arch enthusiasts or well versed linux enthusiasts.

          If I’m talking with someone that only knows a few distro names saying you use arch gets what you are using across without having to explain what EndevourOS is. I don’t think it should be lumped in with other arch based distros that use their own repos either. The default config being so close to archinstall is one of the main reasons I switched

    • blinfabian@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      for me at least, endevour and cachy dont rlly have an identity, they feel like Arch but easier to install with very little difference in actual use

      • Auth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        They do. They have their own identity, community and user culture. Go make a post on the arch fourms, endevour fourms and cachy fourms and it will be 3 different experiences because they cater to different niches of people. Majority of Arch users will never get their system as optimized as cachy.

        There is little different in actual use between all linux distros. They all feel mostly the same but the differences are there and they are what makes linux cool.