• IcyToes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Questions against it is usually bigoted. It seemed to be the popular MAGA dogwhistle this election.

    • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      It’s not really a dogwhistle, DEI is diversity, equity and inclusion - they’re outright saying they don’t want diversity equity and inclusion.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 days ago

        DEI is a dog whistle in that for conservatives it means woke. They want companies to continue oppressing non white, non-cis, non-hetero people. Or at the very least, not actively elevate them.

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          But we can hear the whistle too. Being against diversity, equality, and inclusion is pretty blatant mask-off stuff.

        • Batman@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Yes! I want to see data somewhere. I hear all the time that DEI puts less qualified people in positions but I think I’ve only read one article about this being found out and provable (no idea if it was even fact, it was so many years ago) though I have not researched the data or anything. I think it’s similar to the “welfare queen” screeching. Because one shit person took advantage of a system meant to help, does not mean that all who are a part of that system have the same goal.

          And the recent news of Elon wanting to hire from overseas because Americans are too dumb. Assume by race and location of person that they are the most qualified… hmmm. Their bigotry doesn’t even make sense consistently.

          • socsa@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            The idea that there is an objectively “most qualified” candidate is a fairy tale for people who have never done high level professional hiring at any scale. The idea is that if you have two candidates with similar credentials, diversity itself can be a value added item for a bunch of reasons which are not easily reflected on resumes.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 days ago

              I literally just went through this in a job interview. I was told very clearly that every person they interviewed was able to do the job they wanted with their eyes closed and it was not going to be an easy decision for them and in the end would be about very tiny details. I didn’t get the position, but when it’s put to you that way, it also makes you a lot less unhappy when you don’t get it.

          • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            The data is available but data doesn’t make a fucking difference here. The people pushing anti-DEI policies are racists and they don’t care if it’s good for the company.

            They just want to hurt people.