Smarf Durden@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 days agoNintendo Responds to Leaks: "Not Official"smarfdurden.wordpress.comexternal-linkmessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1123arrow-down18
arrow-up1115arrow-down1external-linkNintendo Responds to Leaks: "Not Official"smarfdurden.wordpress.comSmarf Durden@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 days agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squaremorphballganon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down7·20 days agoSNES was top loading with receding flaps. NES was front loading with a flap cover. Must I point out all of the changes, or can you do some critical thinking before you argue?
minus-squaref4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·20 days agoJapan never got a front-loader with bonus connection problems and extra empty space in the carts.
minus-squarebob_lemon@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·20 days agoThe Japanese version of the NES was a toploader, and the NES itself had a toploader version later on as well. Also, what’s with the personal attack?
minus-squaremorphballganon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·19 days agoSorry, just frustrated to see the same assumption every generation, after ever generation sees massive change. In retrospect, it’s probably new people making the same assumption, not the same people.
minus-squaremissingno@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·20 days agoDo you really consider that to be a meaningful point worth "um, akshually"ing over?
SNES was top loading with receding flaps. NES was front loading with a flap cover.
Must I point out all of the changes, or can you do some critical thinking before you argue?
Japan never got a front-loader with bonus connection problems and extra empty space in the carts.
The Japanese version of the NES was a toploader, and the NES itself had a toploader version later on as well.
Also, what’s with the personal attack?
Sorry, just frustrated to see the same assumption every generation, after ever generation sees massive change. In retrospect, it’s probably new people making the same assumption, not the same people.
Do you really consider that to be a meaningful point worth "um, akshually"ing over?