• MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah, sure, that’s always the case for consoles. I have no objection to that train of thought. If you want versatility and an open platform you’re going to be better off with a similarly specced PC handheld. At the cost of first party exclusives and a few other creature comforts, but if you’re only going to buy one device and that’s a priority that’s clearly the way to go.

    Looking at it in general and in the market and just looking at the hardware they’re packing in, though, their proposition isn’t super overpriced. The part that is a bummer is they seem to be shifting that extra cost to other places with the subscription, generational upgrade packs, higher physical game prices and so on.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It is quite a shift from how Nintendo’s been doing things since the Wii. They were always the weaker hardware at a lower price guys, so this is quite a change in their philosophy. I saw you said as much in another comment. They’ll be competing more directly with Sony and Microsoft than they have since the Gamecube. I’ll be interested to see how selling at top dollar does for them in the particularly unstable global market we have now.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep. This is a shockingly… Playstationy proposition. First party games aside I would have not been surprised to see a Vita revival be this exact console. I mean, they’re basically shipping Bloodborne 2 and EyeToy.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Nintendo’s pricing themselves with the big boys again, let’s see how they do!