I know I remember seeing some people talk about how nice some of the environments in Hitman were, and that they’d just walk around as a tourist from time to time, treating it like a walking simulator/virtual tourism thing instead of the stealth assassination game it is. Curious about other things like that, where you play a game totally differently than it was meant to be played.

    • who@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      An argument could be made that Gwent offers better gameplay than the larger game in which it resides.

      • takeda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Then you purchased a wrong game and should just play solitaire.

        Witcher 3 is absolutely great, but if you just go through only the main quest, won’t explore the world and won’t do side quests then I can see you ending up disappointed.

        What I like is that side quests can impact the main quest and even the ending.

        • who@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Then you purchased a wrong game

          Perhaps.

          But you’ve made a lot of assumptions in your comment, and you’re mistaken about most of them.

          I played the side quests. Many came with a good backstory, but that is not gameplay. Nearly all were copy/paste instances from a small pool of tedious tasks. There were a few memorable exceptions, but very few.

          I explored the world, as much as one can “explore” something that is fully labeled with point-of-interest markers. They lead the player to a repetitive handful of uninspired encounters, cloned over and over again.

          It has plenty of other flaws as well. If you loved it, then I’m happy for you, but I found the gameplay boring.

          The strengths I found in The Witcher 3 were its story, lore, characters, and Gwent. Not its gameplay.

          Meanwhile, Gwent is a surprisingly well-designed strategy game. So much so that it ended up spun off into a stand-alone version (although I don’t know how good the spinoff is).

          To each their own, I suppose.

      • Owl@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        There is no argument if the statement is objectively true

        The Witcher 3’s gameplay was so bad that I couldn’t finish it (the map and the quests’ gameplay part too, but that’s another story). Gwent was pretty cool though

      • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Are we certain Witcher is the larger game in which Gwent resides and not the other way around?

      • FelixCress@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        An argument could be made that you are a genius. Both arguments would be equally wrong.