Literally from the start I said that Bitcoin is propped up by illegal markets, because it is. You asked for a source, I showed you sources showing the value of drug markets which use Bitcoin are in THE TRILLIONS.
That proves my argument. You then started shifting goalposts. And every time you end up saying something silly, like “Bitcoin didn’t exponentially grow in value, or if it did, so has gold”, then try to prove that statement by showing data which proves you wrong. :D
It’s hilarious.
Again, I did. You’re illiterate.
“I said I’m right because me saying how I totally use Bitcoin all the time for legal transactions worth at least like, dozens of dollars, proves that Bitcoin isn’t actually propped by illegal drug markets”
I never said that
I never said you said anything. I implied you implied it, which you did. Or have you not been pretending like implications don’t exist, but you genuinely don’t understand what the word means?
: “Holding Bitcoin indirectly funds crime”
I NEVER SAID THAT STOP MAKING THINGS UP :(((((((((
See how childish that sounds?
Investing in Bitcoin does fund crime. That’s a simple fact proven over and over by what can easily be inferred from the fact that practically all of the transactions in Bitcoin are for drugs, monetary value, I don’t give a toss if you think buying some booster packs makes even the slightest dent in the TRILLIONS that the drug markets are worth. Not to even talk about all the other crime.
You also have to pretend you said Bitcoin hasn’t exponentially grown in value. It has. You claimed “if Bitcoin has, then gold has as well” and showed evidence proving you wrong.
I’ve asked a few times now, what’s your native language? Can’t be English, can it?
“Exponential” has a meaning as well. Remember when you told me to check it, and I did, and then you still stomped your foot about how Bitcoin didn’t have exponential growth in value, or if it did, then gold did as well, then you proceeded to prove yourself wrong? Remember that?
Well, that all happened after I linked you proof of how there’s trillions in value being used by the drug trade. This means that if you invest in that market, it’s value will grow, and the people who already have the largest market portion and are holding the most, experience the most profit. And those people, like I’ve proved a dozen times, are criminals.
Oh wee got to the point where you’ve just completely shut down and are just having such a tantrum you won’t even inputting words, but have to spam smileys.
“Yawn”, like some kid told me earlier.
“Holding” =/= investing
Using =/= holding.
I’ve asked a few times now, what’s your native language? Can’t be English, can it?
“Exponential” has a meaning as well. Remember when you told me to check it, and I did, and then you still stomped your foot about how Bitcoin didn’t have exponential growth in value, or if it did, then gold did as well, then you proceeded to prove yourself wrong? Remember that?
Well, that all happened after I linked you proof of how there’s trillions in value being used by the drug trade. This means that if you invest in that market, it’s value will grow, and the people who already have the largest market portion and are holding the most, experience the most profit. And those people, like I’ve proved a dozen times, are criminals.
But you can’t address any of that. You can’t even say anything anymore.
Just keep shaming yourself publicly, because you can’t stand behind your words, you fumble make embarrassing mistakes, prove yourself wrong with your own data. It’s ridiculous.
Like I’ve said all along, you know you’re wrong, and you’re just unable to admit it. I’ve seen this tantrum literally thousands of times online.
What you should do is take the L and slink away, but you wont.
You’ll keep replying out of some weird obsession, despite being very clearly wrong about a bunch of things, which I’m gonna list once more.
I proved my claim that supporting Bitcoin indirectly supports drug cartels, (with data from Europol among other sources). You couldn’t accept it. You started having this tantrum, which I’ve been being entertained by for days.
You said Bitcoin hasn’t had exponential growth, and then thought that gold did, and then linked data proving yourself wrong.
How much more can you shame yourself man? Just take the L, bow and next time don’t talk about shit you don’t understand the basics of. :D
More pathetic avoidance, because you’re still trying to “win” a debate you yourself proved yourself wrong in.
It’s hilarious.
You need less physical gold today to buy a house than in 1901. Yet you cry “go look at the definition of the word ‘exponential’”. I genuinely can’t make up stuff this hilarious. And you keep giving me more.
So, I have proved and sourced my claim and all you can do is spam immature garbage. Does it make you feel like a winner? ;>
Literally from the start I said that Bitcoin is propped up by illegal markets, because it is. You asked for a source, I showed you sources showing the value of drug markets which use Bitcoin are in THE TRILLIONS.
That proves my argument. You then started shifting goalposts. And every time you end up saying something silly, like “Bitcoin didn’t exponentially grow in value, or if it did, so has gold”, then try to prove that statement by showing data which proves you wrong. :D
It’s hilarious.
“I said I’m right because me saying how I totally use Bitcoin all the time for legal transactions worth at least like, dozens of dollars, proves that Bitcoin isn’t actually propped by illegal drug markets”
I never said you said anything. I implied you implied it, which you did. Or have you not been pretending like implications don’t exist, but you genuinely don’t understand what the word means?
I NEVER SAID THAT STOP MAKING THINGS UP :(((((((((
See how childish that sounds?
Investing in Bitcoin does fund crime. That’s a simple fact proven over and over by what can easily be inferred from the fact that practically all of the transactions in Bitcoin are for drugs, monetary value, I don’t give a toss if you think buying some booster packs makes even the slightest dent in the TRILLIONS that the drug markets are worth. Not to even talk about all the other crime.
You also have to pretend you said Bitcoin hasn’t exponentially grown in value. It has. You claimed “if Bitcoin has, then gold has as well” and showed evidence proving you wrong.
I can’t make anything as entertaining, thanks.
🥱
“Holding” =/= investing
Using =/= holding.
I’ve asked a few times now, what’s your native language? Can’t be English, can it?
“Exponential” has a meaning as well. Remember when you told me to check it, and I did, and then you still stomped your foot about how Bitcoin didn’t have exponential growth in value, or if it did, then gold did as well, then you proceeded to prove yourself wrong? Remember that?
Well, that all happened after I linked you proof of how there’s trillions in value being used by the drug trade. This means that if you invest in that market, it’s value will grow, and the people who already have the largest market portion and are holding the most, experience the most profit. And those people, like I’ve proved a dozen times, are criminals.
But you can’t address any of that.
🥱
Oh wee got to the point where you’ve just completely shut down and are just having such a tantrum you won’t even inputting words, but have to spam smileys.
“Yawn”, like some kid told me earlier.
“Holding” =/= investing
Using =/= holding.
I’ve asked a few times now, what’s your native language? Can’t be English, can it?
“Exponential” has a meaning as well. Remember when you told me to check it, and I did, and then you still stomped your foot about how Bitcoin didn’t have exponential growth in value, or if it did, then gold did as well, then you proceeded to prove yourself wrong? Remember that?
Well, that all happened after I linked you proof of how there’s trillions in value being used by the drug trade. This means that if you invest in that market, it’s value will grow, and the people who already have the largest market portion and are holding the most, experience the most profit. And those people, like I’ve proved a dozen times, are criminals.
But you can’t address any of that. You can’t even say anything anymore.
Just keep shaming yourself publicly, because you can’t stand behind your words, you fumble make embarrassing mistakes, prove yourself wrong with your own data. It’s ridiculous.
Let’s see how you’re gonna continue this tantrum.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone put so much effort into shadowboxing to defend such a boring take.
🥱
Like I’ve said all along, you know you’re wrong, and you’re just unable to admit it. I’ve seen this tantrum literally thousands of times online.
What you should do is take the L and slink away, but you wont.
You’ll keep replying out of some weird obsession, despite being very clearly wrong about a bunch of things, which I’m gonna list once more.
I proved my claim that supporting Bitcoin indirectly supports drug cartels, (with data from Europol among other sources). You couldn’t accept it. You started having this tantrum, which I’ve been being entertained by for days.
You said Bitcoin hasn’t had exponential growth, and then thought that gold did, and then linked data proving yourself wrong.
How much more can you shame yourself man? Just take the L, bow and next time don’t talk about shit you don’t understand the basics of. :D
🥱
Edit because max comment depth reached:
Okay, the irony of this one actually made me snort audibly.
Exactly as I called it.
More pathetic avoidance, because you’re still trying to “win” a debate you yourself proved yourself wrong in.
It’s hilarious.
You need less physical gold today to buy a house than in 1901. Yet you cry “go look at the definition of the word ‘exponential’”. I genuinely can’t make up stuff this hilarious. And you keep giving me more.
So, I have proved and sourced my claim and all you can do is spam immature garbage. Does it make you feel like a winner? ;>