Clown emojis all around

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    this is starting to be horseshit. Every windows computer has a version of fucking solitare on it , there are other card based games that don’t get this treatment, and the lootboxes are actual gambling.

    I thought at the start it was a type of beurocratical problem, but it’s been too long.

    • tb_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not entirely sure about the European PEGI, but the American ESRB is funded by the same companies that it regulates. It was created after the outcry about violent games and was the industry self-regulating to avoid the government getting more involved.

      It is a lobby group for the industry, for better and in this case very much for worse.

      I assume PEGI is little different.

      • saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        PEGI and many other groups are private groups. They’re not an authority of any form. They’re not associated with government, public regulation, or public election. They’re a group of people that create their own standards outside of the ISO or any actual regulation representing the public.

        Some countries do have actual public systems, but many just have these private groups that know best.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        That would be the point, yes. Balatro has cards and chips, but chips are just there for keeping points. If Balatro is 18+ for gambling imagery, then so should Solitaire. That would be stupid, so Balatro shouldn’t get it, either.

        • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think the important note is it’s not just the cards in Balatro. Is it right? Not in my opinion. You have to admit tho, that it uses waaaaay more gambling imagery (you make antes for fuck’s sake)

            • Cypher@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I haven’t played or watched Balataro but from the description on steam

              You’re going to need every edge you can get in order to reach the boss blind, beat the final ante and secure victory.

              Unless ante here is referring to something else it seems it does have them?

              • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                “Antes” are what Balatro calls its levels. Each level consists of 3 stages, which the game calls “blinds” (small/big/boss).

                In poker, you don’t “beat” an ante, it’s part of what you bet. You also don’t “reach” blinds, nor is there such a thing as a “boss blind” in poker. And the word “bet” or any synonym should be pretty conspicuous by its absence in Balatro’s description. There is no gambling without betting/wagering, after all.

                So yes, if you’re familiar with poker, that description should make it obvious that the words have different meanings in the game than they do in poker.

                The only actual ‘mechanic’ that’s actually the same in Balatro as in poker is what comprises the different hands, and their relative value. And even then, there are also hands in Balatro that don’t exist in poker at all (five of a kind, flush house, etc.).

                • Cypher@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Firstly you could read user names before going off, I was simply asking a question that Im unwilling to buy the game to answer.

  • derpgon@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Fuck PEGI, their ratings always sucked and weren’t useful at all. Full blown swearing? 13+. One cigar through 500 hours of gameplay? Adults only. Never cared, never will.

  • tlou3please@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wish lawmakers had some balls on this subject. If there’s gambling, they should have to register as a gambling company and comply with all the other restrictions on gambling advertisements in each jurisdiction.