According to historians such as François Furet, the new government gave themselves unlimited power which was immediately abused by it. Only about two thirds of men gained the right to vote, favoring wealth, and none of the women, and the King was still in power. After the second round of revolution France split into three factions fighting internally which led directly into the “Reign of Terror.”
And then Emperor Napoleon.
But yes, you could say the French Revolution had some beneficial long term results, now how about you defend the 200+ wars that France has been in over the last two millenium as well?
Science demands rigorous testing of all three of those hypotheses before making a conclusion.
I present to you 15,000 years of human history. 40,000 if you count the Neanderthal extinction.
The French revolution - and most of that history - contradict your hypotheses.
According to historians such as François Furet, the new government gave themselves unlimited power which was immediately abused by it. Only about two thirds of men gained the right to vote, favoring wealth, and none of the women, and the King was still in power. After the second round of revolution France split into three factions fighting internally which led directly into the “Reign of Terror.”
And then Emperor Napoleon.
But yes, you could say the French Revolution had some beneficial long term results, now how about you defend the 200+ wars that France has been in over the last two millenium as well?
deleted by creator
What a complete non-response to my comment. You really fought this battle without fighting, Sunzu.
deleted by creator
Lmao you immediately fall back on Ad Hominem, too. Of the 36 stratagems I suggest the best one for you.
deleted by creator