• _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah yeah, call me when they actually start making stuff with it. I’ve been hearing about this (or something extremely similar) for at least 2 years and nothing seems to have made it to market yet.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Try 20. Hell, try 100.

      But wait! There is more!

      Revolutionary new battery!

      Revolutionary new water from air device!

      Revolutionary new…

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Uh huh

          And was there a single huge revolution? That was my point: clickbait

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            It is because of people like you that marketing has to use clickbaity titles, because you refuse to believe that technically difficult tasks take decades to achieve. Here you are, whining about clickbait, when they have pictures of a production plant they spent millions to build. The absolute scammers!

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Battery tech actually has revolutionised in the past couple decades, you just haven’t noticed because it’s been a series of incremental changes.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Did I say that it hasn’t?

          Progress has been made, of course, and yes, in small incremental steps

          I’m saying that the damn near daily “THERE IS A REVOLUTIONARY DISCOVERY!!!” posts are 99.9% bullshit, its all clickbait to get more money

    • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      One hurdle I’m guessing this has is that normal wood is already pretty strong and (counterintuitively) fire-resistant. You’d have to add a lot of strength at a price point that’s reasonable to make it worth bothering.

      • Wolf314159@startrek.website
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The article makes it clear that this superwood is not meant to compete with wood used it traditional stick built construction. It’s meant to compete with structural steel once it has been able to get certified for those uses and building codes are adapted.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      In this article’s case no, it’s talking about one of those “wood but compressed down into a higher density” type materials.

      I’m not sure pykrete would be truly fire resistant anyway, I’d imagine the ice component would stop it burning, but given that it would melt, the heat from a nearby fire would still pose a problem for it I’d assume.