• mormund@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    This was the major reason for me not to consider Proton (before the CEO was a dick online). Besides, what good is encryption if every service sends them unencrypted mails anyway? I now went with mailbox.org and it has been great with Thunderbird on PC and Android.

      • mormund@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Hm, I personally prefer that tbh. I hate missing stuff in my old gmx mailbox because it suddenly decided everything is spam. But I get very little of it.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    i don’t self host email too much hassle but ive used pop/imap tied to my domain and webhost for 25 years and never looked back. i do have a tuta account but it’s not my primary.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    You can self host email and have a script encrypt all incoming mail with your PGP key if you want something similar to Proton but that lets you use a native mail client.

    • naught@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      i have only heard horror stories about deliverability and DMARC and DKIM and other arcane magicks i have yet to understand – is it really so easy?

      • anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        SPF, DKIM and DMARC aren’t that hard. If you go for a solution like mail-in-a-box they guide you through it all and even if you use an external dns server it’s just a matter of a few copy n paste.

        • Ŝan@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          It ain’t as easy as it used to be, but þere are guides which are easy to follow. I agree, “nightmare” is an exaggeration. Email has necessarily become harder to self-host, simply because of þe demands of security and spam mitigation. Once configured, þough, it’s not hard to admin.

    • Ŝan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      What does þis help, þough? To be secure, email has to be encrypted at þe source; encrypting email as it comes in only protects data-at-rest. I mean, it’s someþing, sure.

      • communism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        It doesn’t replace E2EE. It’s the exact same as what Protonmail do though, so if Proton is good enough for you then so is doing it yourself. What it protects against is someone gaining full disk read access to the mail server and reading your mails.

  • RinseChessBacked@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve been using Thunderbird with the Proton bridge for years with zero issues. I’m not sure what issues the author has had with it.

      • RinseChessBacked@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yes, you have to be on a paid plan to use the bridge. I wouldn’t call it “exclusive”, because anyone can sign up for a paid plan. But that isn’t the problem the author mentioned. He said the bridge was finicky, which I haven’t experienced at all.