• Laser@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    While I’m a total sucker for audio CDs, portable devices make little sense. They’re always somewhat big due to media size and they’re susceptible to shock, which is very common when carrying something… Though if you just carry it to use somewhere else, it’s probably fine. But what I got from the article is that it’s actually to be used on the go.

    Anyhow, I welcome everything that helps CDs coming back into the mainstream…

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      As a kid who grew up taking a CD player to school before mp3 players got affordable, this is a solved problem. Anti skip where the player has a buffer (mine was 45 seconds) that fills up when it’s stable and plays when it’s shocked.

      I don’t know if this has it, but “CDs, portable devices make little sense” is totally wrong, I carried my CD player in my front jeans pocket for over a year and it was my jam.

      • Laser@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I didn’t write it’s impossible to make portable CD players, I too owned one with similar buffer size, just that they make little sense nowadays, with the reasons being the following:

        • mechanical parts that have to move with high precision
        • limited amount of music per medium (typically up to 80 minutes)
        • lack of metadata apart from CD-TEXT which isn’t universally supported
        • flat structure only (tracks 1-99, not a real problem with the limited amount of space)
        • not the greatest battery efficiency

        All these limitations lead to portable CD players vanishing from shelves because portable MP3 beat them in all of the above over 20 years ago. Today, you can just use your phone , which most people have with them most of the time, and if you’re using a lossless format, you’re not losing a single feature.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’re better off with a decent portable media player that can hold thousands of ripped CDs in a lossless format. Portable CD players just end up scratching up your CDs.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          They shouldn’t, its a no contact medium. Poot handling though will ruin them.

          • sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            cd’s are the worst media format. fragile and exposed. imagine if floppy disks didnt have cases and you needed to gingerly hold the disc inside by its edges. that.

            the mini-disc was superior but proprietary so it sank.

            when ipods and other digital media players were invented I didnt buy a single cd ever again

            • BCsven@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I get that, Floptical Drives were interestinf, but mp3 players and iPod didn’t have great sound with the lossy format, and digital conversion.

              I’m the type that hears the difference between lossy and something like WAV format. Lossy ones always sound muddy to me. So CD and DVD audio appeal to some people. And If I’m going to take a DAC with me, then a CD one is pretty neat.