• rtxn@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I was already an adult when I learned that “salmon” is supposed to be pronounced as “sammon”.

        • Emotional (he/him)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          ah, I was wondering because, in comparison to my native tongue (French), I’ve found English significantly more intuitive. I may be biased though, or French may just be another mongrel of a language 😅

          My uneducated feeling so far is that most languages weren’t developed with particularly logical rules, and rules were added retroactively, and as such, most languages are ugly amalgamations, but English gets some of the worst rep because of its dominance on the internet.

    • Greddan@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s just every language once you get into it. English is a fairly standard north germanic language. There’s been a lot of mythology built around it over the years which often leads to misunderstandings, especially from monolinguals who simply have nothing to compare to.

        • Greddan@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          The German language is ironically one of the weirder Germanic languages. When I say North Germanic languages I mostly mean what is now known as Scandinavian languages (and sometimes Dutch depending on who you ask).

            • Greddan@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              I think they’ve been on the ball with spelling reforms as the language has evolved. The last one as recently as in 1996. English has no central authority for spelling, making such reforms much harder to implement. Conservatives are of course, like always, a problem. Being against any and all spelling reform. The main argument seem to be that it makes it harder for people to read really old texts in their original form. Which for some reason makes spelling and speach drifting apart worth it. I known Swedish conservative pseudo-intellectuals often praise the English for it’s lack of reform.

              • lad@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Besides, they say ‘read really old texts’ as if this is easily achieved right now, which it is not