I am not a Tom Cruise fan at all, but on a whim I decided to rewatch this movie. I was pleasantly surprised by the rewatch.

I remembered that the movie started with a bang and was doing great until Cruise and Blunt got to the farm house then it stalled.

That was not my experience this time around. This was a really fun movie. The production values were top notch, the action was spectacular and the movie did a really good job of sticking to its logic. I also really loved the mech suits. I list this as the best use of a mech suit in a movie with District 9 and Avatar as a close second and third.

  • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not a complete list but here’s a selection of movies that have come out since the turn of the century that I feel beat it out in ranking for “best action movie”:

    Matrix Reloaded

    Lord of The Rings trilogy

    John Wick 4

    Logan

    Mad Max: Fury Road

    Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon

    House of Flying Daggers

    Dredd

    Everything Everywhere All At Once

    But yeah, I mean it’s up there in rarefied air.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I’m pretty sure I watched John Wick 4. I would totally disagree with that one. The further they went the more stupid it got, and it drove me crazy. It stopped being entertaining when everything just turned into gun magic (particularly for the good guys) instead of gun fu. The first one is great, is grounded, and it has stakes. Then they lose it, especially when they’re walking around with their suit coats that block any bullet and can’t be harmed. I’d rather watch Wanted or something if I want gun magic. At least it’s willing to have fun with the idea.

    • VeryVito@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon

      I’m gonna be “that guy” and point out that 2000 was technically the end of the 20th Century.

      The 21st didn’t start until January 1, 2001.

      And yes, people hated it when “that guy” pointed this out 25 years ago, too.

      • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        That’s valid, but I prefer to use 0-indexing even though there’s no year 0. If somebody asks me about “the 2010s”, I’m gonna include 2010 in that, not 2020