Ephera@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 day agoWhat's up with FUTO?drewdevault.comexternal-linkmessage-square101fedilinkarrow-up1240arrow-down14
arrow-up1236arrow-down1external-linkWhat's up with FUTO?drewdevault.comEphera@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square101fedilink
minus-squarequick_snail@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 hours ago Yarvin has proclaimed that black people are genetically predisposed to a lower IQ than white people The second part of that is true, because the IQ test is unreliable. That’s why its banned in California schools for POC
minus-squareJcbAzPx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 hours agoThat statement only has one part. Could you clarify what you mean here? I’m not sure I understand.
minus-squarequick_snail@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·12 minutes agoThe first part says people with more melanin in their skin are inferior. This is false. The second part says people with more melanin in their skin score lower on IQ tests. This is true (because IQ tests are terrible, and its creator said so too)
minus-squarenek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-24 hours agoI think it’s that the statement in question was proclaimed is the “first part”. Or maybe the genetic predisposition is. Unclear.
The second part of that is true, because the IQ test is unreliable. That’s why its banned in California schools for POC
That statement only has one part. Could you clarify what you mean here? I’m not sure I understand.
The first part says people with more melanin in their skin are inferior. This is false.
The second part says people with more melanin in their skin score lower on IQ tests. This is true (because IQ tests are terrible, and its creator said so too)
I think it’s that the statement in question was proclaimed is the “first part”. Or maybe the genetic predisposition is. Unclear.