slazer2au@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 hours agoNew EU directive drop.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1317arrow-down14
arrow-up1313arrow-down1imageNew EU directive drop.lemmy.worldslazer2au@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 hours agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squareunknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up22·17 hours agoDelete nano already. Let’s make micro the standard!!
minus-squaretal@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·16 hours agoed is, in fact, in the POSIX standard. https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/ Shell & Utilities -> Utilities -> ed In fact, it looks like ex and sed, both child editors of ed, are baked into the standard. No pico-family editors.
minus-squarewizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 hours agoNice, an analognowhere I missed!
minus-squareashenone@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9·17 hours agoWhy should micro be the standard over nano?
minus-squareunknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·edit-215 hours agoBecause nano has unacceptable key combos, and no support for mouse. micro has sensible key combos, good syntax highlighting and supports mouse perfectly fine.
minus-squarekaty ✨@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 hours agomake the standard code-insiders but in vim mode
Delete
nanoalready.Let’s make
microthe standard!!Nah,
ededis, in fact, in the POSIX standard.https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/
Shell & Utilities -> Utilities -> ed
In fact, it looks like
exandsed, both child editors ofed, are baked into the standard. Nopico-family editors.Nice, an analognowhere I missed!
Why should micro be the standard over nano?
Because
nanohas unacceptable key combos, and no support for mouse.microhas sensible key combos, good syntax highlighting and supports mouse perfectly fine.make the standard
code-insidersbut in vim mode