If the situation calls for it, I would be too tempted to say:

“What are you gonna do? Shoot me?”

A good chunk of shareholders deferring to public agencies that recommend based on societal good is imo the only way capitalism could “work”. Of course Elon is against it.

What the fuck is wrong with current browsers that it’s gonna improve on?

Chrome is very heavy these days, would an LLM powered browser be lightweight? I really really doubt it.

The mind wonders when you’re doing mundane tasks. A sheep herder would be lost in their thoughts all day.

He was very good in succession at pretending to be a rich prick.

I think they casted well

I can tell you how, Jared Leto.

I used to like him but he’s been consistently disappointing me for like a decade.

That’s impossible, one of the core features of Apollo was that it was lightweight, no ads. Public for profit companies are unable to do that.

I bet it’s similar to the Epstein list.

See, Jared was smart enough to traffic 18+ year olds (based on what I’ve heard about his cult). So he was in the inner circles without actually being a pedophile.

IMO this community is more about questions that are obvious to some but not others, hence why some might think they are stupid questions. This example question is something that isn’t common sense for the majority, so yeah imo it’s the wrong community to ask in.

It’s kind of like that comic and being today’s lucky 10,000

Nah the bat signal light is a red herring, when the light turns on, it just sends an email to Batman. The light is more about keeping criminals afraid cause you know, Batman likes to scare people.

It also jumped out at me too cause it was literally the opposite of the most true thing about AI.

Sure, you can argue that it helps and that improves productivity in some niche use cases, but by definition, there isn’t anything real there. It’s an empty husk that has been contorted to echo user prompts based on past Q&A.

It’s literally like calling a foot print something real cause you can reconstruct some of the foot.

That makes sense, they want to show ads to people who don’t want to see ads and don’t have time to see many.

IMO it just means advertisement is self defeating in the long run.

Ehhh, Hollywood is pretty obsessed with high school kids in general. I think it has something to do with certain people peaking in high school.

I personally think it’s to do with luck in life, when someone is very fortunate, they diverge from the masses around high school.

Yeah idk why this model never took off, I’m guessing cause of greed.

Give me a wallet, I can fill it with watching ads and then use it for your service.

I think the reason why it doesn’t work is because it allows the user to minimize their ad exposure, not maximize.

If you have a job that you can be confidently wrong without any self awareness after the fact, then yeah I guess.

But I can’t think of many jobs like that except something that is mostly just politics.

Hmmm, Aerosmith is the key eh, works for me!

Okay I call BS, exercise before shower is a no brainer, now which type of exercise or whether to even go, that’s the challenge.

Oh a new kind of advanced glasses, does it zoom or auto adjust to your prescription?

Reads article

Wait are they seriously trying google glass again? Why is it always the solution looking for a problem people the same as the supply side people. They don’t understand that demand is the real driver.

the company that is home to franchises like John Wick and The Hunger Games could repackage one of its signature series as an anime, generated entirely by AI in a matter of hours, and resell it as a new movie

How would this have any demand, if someone likes John wick movies, they can just watch that. This isn’t like selling cars that adding more color options would get new audiences.

Do they really think there are people out there that want to watch John wick but it’s not anime enough for them?

Watching a different adaptation (like a movie from a book) is interesting cause of the new artistic take on the source material. AI wouldn’t do that, it would just “reskin” the same movie, which by definition would always be inferior in terms of fidelity and overall polish/quality.

Maybe this is why it sold less:

Hey, we were thinking of seeing a movie, what do you think we should watch.

Nope

Yeah I guess we can skip movie night this week.