Gears 4 felt more like a filler game where a lot of things get introduced but nothing gets carried forward into the rest of the game. The game felt like it was designed exclusively to set up the narrative for Gears 5.

I’m 1 hour into Gears 5 and I felt that the narrative within the first one hour of the game felt a lot better. Gears 4 felt like you were the only living beings out there but gears 5 feels less lonely.

I don’t know how the rest of the game is but this is my first impression.

Multiplayer wise gears 5 is amazing. I have 10 hours in MP and Horde so far and I love the horde mode. MP is a sweatfest like its always been in gears.

  • N0ll@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is the writing any better? I’m 36 and it felt like 4 was written for players 20 years younger than me

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s definitely more interesting than 4. It’s been a while since I played either, but remember thinking 5 felt like a better game all around.

    • SpaciousCoder78@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Close to finishing act 1 and JD is still the MC so writing is still fine. Not sure about the rest of the game

    • SpaciousCoder78@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think I’m just one chapter before the open world section. It’s gonna make more sense in a few hours why it’s boring to me

  • verdi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    These games feel like they were made for people 30y old than I am. The writing is atrocious…

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s weird since the last comment I read said they were 36 and felt it was for people 20 years younger than them.

      • verdi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        20 and 80 seems about the right parallel, they both vote for fascists in droves so it kinda checks out. I’d wager the level of idiocy is neck and neck.

  • Linktank@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Shocked this game had any sequels at all. Came out sometime after the original halo and it had like 4 weapons. Did they add more?

    • B0NK3RS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not sure what Halo has to do with it? Also from what I remember Gears was a huge franchise back in the peak Xbox 360 days so of course it got sequels

    • Nelots@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Honestly. Games that came out after late 2001 and have less than 5 weapons have no business getting sequels. That said, I feel like we’re ignoring some more important criteria here. Like the amount of main characters named John. Gears of War didn’t have any! Can you believe that??