• Lena@gregtech.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I mean it does represent the soviet union, a brutal dictatorship. Though I don’t think there’s a better symbol

    • dogbert@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The hammer and sickle is used by practically every socialist movement. What sort of leftist doesn’t know that??

      • Lena@gregtech.eu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I know. It’s just that it was originally created by the soviet union.

        • dogbert@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The nation that created the most successful iteration of socialism ever…

            • dogbert@lemmy.zipOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              If we mention China, the libs here are gonna be even more pissed. Baby steps.

          • Lena@gregtech.eu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            you have got to be kidding me. Tankies gonna tankie i guess

            • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              As an Anarchist even I have to acknowledge that to date the Soviet Union has been the most successful socialist state, of course I am also of the belief that if the Republicans won in Catalonia or the Anarchists in Ukraine they would have established far more successful implementations of socialism. Still the fact remains that the Soviet Union was by all metrics available successful and even until the very end the majority of people in nearly every SSR supported keeping the Soviet Union alive (if not with reforms), they suffered CIA and western backed reactionary rebellions and I don’t belive any other socialist state would have handled it any better

              (yes according to polling made by the reactionaries to gage how much the Soviet population wanted to end to the Soviet Union the majority did not, they promptly ignored the results)

              • Lena@gregtech.eu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                None of your fam is from there probably

                How would you know that?

                • алсааас [she/they]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 minutes ago

                  Because I know what the polls look like for people who actually lived there, because I know my families’ opinion and because I know the results of the 1991 referendum

            • dogbert@lemmy.zipOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Name a more successful iteration of socialism. I’ll wait. You seem very confident about this lol.

              Edit: they were never heard from again 🤣

                • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  46 minutes ago

                  Socialist isn’t entirely the opposite of authoritarian. In some dimensions it is. In others it’s unrelated. The USSR can be both socialist and authoritarian. Many argue it was both.

                • dogbert@lemmy.zipOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Socialism requires a dictatorship of the proletariat. Have you never read theory?

                  • nexguy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    That is “state socialism” as pushed by cold war propaganda (marxism-leninism interpretation). Socialism certainly doesn’t require a dictatorship.

                • dogbert@lemmy.zipOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  This is just a link for an anarchism FAQ. Feel free to just name the nations. You can type it out.

                  And yes, I do consider a nation that went from millions of peasants, to exploring space, providing free education, free healthcare, and women’s rights, while going toe to toe with the greatest capital super power of all time as a success.

                  • Lena@gregtech.eu
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    Feel free to just name the nations.

                    It’s an anarchism FAQ :P

                    It was a brutal dictatorship. What they achieved does not excuse that.