• jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s really vague, and does warrant some specific examples…

        I’d say if anything, they pretend some things are more peaceful than they are. Like sending the military in to capture a foreign leader being portrayed as simply “a military operation” rather than “act of war”. Emphasizing celebrations by Venezulan ex-pats.

        The nominally socialist nations that receive media attention are generally truly not particularly peaceful, and the socialist nations that are pretty good peace wise are well known, but just too ‘boring’ to be in a ‘news’ cycle.

        I suppose the point is that people can’t just take someone’s declaration of ‘socialism’ at face value, as there’s too many examples of malicious authoritarianism that claimed affinity to socialism as part of their rise to power. Not to say that capitalist nations are faring any better, just that the word ‘socialism’ when wielded as a brand isn’t to be trusted.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          the vast majority of americans don’t know the first thing about political movements originating from the global south. let’s start there

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          We could start with the violent history of union formation. I only got like one line in an elementary school textbook telling me the pinkertons existed and that was it. Then we can move on to the violent bombing of Tulsa, OK which nobody talks about.