cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/36712639

Ubisoft’s first North American union, located at their Halifax, Nova Scotia studio, was certified on December 18th, 2025. Now, not even a full 30 days later, Ubisoft Halifax is closing.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Got it. No more Ubisoft support and no more money given. I’m not a big fan of unions but with no federal laws to protect the workers I am even less of a fan of union busters.

    • beejboytyson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      “Wait your saying the guy that goes in and forcibly changes country regimes with murder is a baddie? No that can’t be it…”

  • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The open corruption and lack of empathy for the working class is just embarrassing. I hate EVERY company now since they only care about shares. They don’t even consider us as human, we are simply just tools for them and can be thrown away at any moment.

    • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They always have. The owners of industry crave for the days of the Golden Age of Capitalism where they get to be the robber barons instead of just hearing tales about their Grandpa.

  • MonkRome@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It’s so easy to not buy games. When was the last good game they made? I guess I’ll continue to ignore their catalog.

    • winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think they own hitman but honestly I still prefer blood money anyway. Play the oldies, goodies or the new Indies, goodies.

      • Xilence@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        IOI bought Hitman back a few years ago, which is why World of Assassination is a thing. Before that, Ubi ruined it with a billion different packages. Now it’s a simple thing to get all three (modern) games.

        • winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Ah ok that’s why its not a steaming pile of shit. I remember when they streamlined it but didn’t realize there was a change over.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Solvent corporations shouldn’t be legally allowed to dissolve positions.

    Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

    • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Eh, we are already unionized in France. The difference is we have laws protecting workers so they can’t just shut a studio down willy nilly.

        • Smoogs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Ok so did they organize and sue the company?

          Cuz enforcement usually requires more work such as a class action suit. Lawyers aren’t just jumping out there suing companies and filing the paper work to protect workers all on their own. There’s usually at least one person organizing it.

          So who’s the person who got let go at Ubisoft that got it started?

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    As far as I’m concerned, unionization should be government mandated for every company everywhere in every industry.

    But unfortunately we live in hell.

    • slappyfuck@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Absolutely this. We need mandated unions for every single company that exists. And with loopholes closed, like offshoring/outsourcing, corporate “headquarters” is a closet in Delaware, etc.

    • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      That’s the way it works in France (and other EU countries, I assume?). We literally have to have a workers reprensative council past a certain number of employees.

      • tflyghtz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I live in Germany. Here its not mandated to have a workers representative council, but you are entitled to be allowed to make one. A workers representative council is distinct from a union, though.

      • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        As a Canadian living north of the nut-hatch, I wish I had the money to excercise my dual citizenship and get out of here to Portugal, or anywhere else in the EU.

    • Iseja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I get where you’re coming from but unions should not be mandated, they need to be formed for the actual workers that want things to change for the better. Just look at Sweden for a good example of how to implement unions at almost all workspaces without the need for the state to be involved.

        • Iseja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          By not getting the state involved at all. All negotiations happens between the workers and the companies with about 88% of workers in Sweden having a collective agreement. All workers also have the right legally to join or start a union and unionbusting is illegal. If the company doesn’t want a collective agreement it usually results in strikes such as the ongoing one against Tesla that has been going on since 2023.

            • Iseja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Was a bit tired when writing the comment, should have been adjusted to minimal involvement as the main procedures should still be between workers and companies with the state just guaranteeing that these procedures can take place at all.

            • Iseja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              True, that we can agree on is necessary to not get into the same situation that happened here. What I’m saying is that it is not necessary for something to be mandatory for it to still be almost universal.

          • zbyte64@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            The pinkertons have entered the chat

            Don’t worry, the America’s free market provides many paramilitary groups to shutdown those pesky unions and curious journalists. No need for government involvement!

            • Iseja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Damn, didn’t even know about those. Starting to sound like the US is just majorily fucked up with how they perceive the neverending chase for more profits (and money in the owners pockets). The problem still with government involvement is that it can then just as easily be removed and you’re back on square one. I’m not well informed enough about the US to actually give any valid input on how you would actually solve this.

    • Magnum, P.I.@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      I started to Boycott Ubisoft when they started online DRM checks for single player games that you could not play offline anymore. It was with the release of Assassins Creed 2 and I think it was Settler 7. That was about 16 years ago.

      • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I started to boycott Ubisoft when I can’t think of a single game of theirs I would even want to play.

        • Magnum, P.I.@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I really wanted to play Watch Dogs when it came out. Unfortunately they also publish a lot of games. They have some cool titles ngl, but I pull through.

          • locahosr443@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I pirated it at some point, it’s was as expected, stuffed with repetitive boring tasks to increase playtime. Didn’t get far before deleting it.

            Oh and driving was still beyond broken over a year past release

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Eh, I haven’t boycott Ubisoft. But also, they don’t make good games so I haven’t bought any either. Might just make it official after this though.